To date the ONLY qualified person who has attempted to uphold his work is Rudolf and he is of course a denier.
For some reason, I can't seem to locate it! Either it got deleted, or I really am getting old! If his post is still on the board, can someone please point it out to me just to satisfy my curiousity. Similary, if it was deleted, point that out also to preserve my sanity!
Anyway, I would like to address the above comment because a valid point can be made from it.
It seems to me, johng, you think that whatever a 'denier' says is simply not credible, simply because he is a 'denier'. If, on the other hand, someone comes to the conclusion there were no gassings, then he must be passed off as a 'denier'. In that hate mongering, bigoted, circular way of thinking, there is no way a person can credibly come to the conclusion there were no gassings.
According to Rudolf (and Leuchter), they once believed there were gassings. When Rudolf looked into it, his whole world view turned upside down. Why is it so hard to believe Rudolf came to an honest, competent conclusion? His and Leuchter's lives were ruined because they told the truth. What was their motive? Do they enjoy being tormented?
People like Rudolf welcome debate. The H Hucksters avoid it. Just from that alone, who are more likely lying? Who are the ones with something to hide? Look at the many 'eye-witness' tales that are obviously absurd. Look at Elie Wiesel. Can you name one prominent revisionist who is anywhere near the obvious liar they are?
What about me, johng? I used to believe there were jews gassed. At least to some degree. When someone suggested to me about 6 years ago that NO jews were gassed, I did not know what to make of it. For whatever reason, I was intruiged. So, I looked into it. After about a year, I had practically no doubt. There were NO gassings. Why would I 'deny'? Maybe because I enjoy being looked at oddly by my coworkers for trying to set the record straight about the Big H? What is my motivation? I'm a mere nobdy. I'm not running for office. I'm not making any money telling people the H is a lie. Women don't seem to be turned on by my attitude. I have very little German blood. What is my motivation? Am I lying to you? Am I lying to myself? What about the other people here on this forum?
From what I have seen, the ones that accuse the revisionists of having an agenda, are the ones with the agenda. The ones who call revisionists the haters are the haters. Another good example of the Polish proverb I mentioned before, the jew kicks you while he screams "stop kicking me".
You know, johng, I can kind of relate to your attitiude though. I find the Big H story so absurd, so impossible to believe, that when I see someone claiming to believe it, I sincerely conclude he has not really looked into it, or due to his (usually jewish)racist attitudes, refuses to consider it may be a lie, or he himself is simply a liar with an agenda.