Grubach's 2nd letter to German Ambassador on Germar Rudolf

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10002
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Grubach's 2nd letter to German Ambassador on Germar Rudolf

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 4 years ago (Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:27 pm)

I'm afraid the German Ambassador is no longer working for Germany's interests.

- Hannover

Ambassador Wolfgang Ischinger

Embassy of Germany

4645 Reservoir Road, NW

Washington, DC 20007

Ambassador Ischinger,

Re: The German government’s persecution of Holocaust revisionist scholar, Germar Rudolf.

You never responded to my letter sent by certified mail, dated January 25, 2006. What is your problem, Wolfgang Ischinger? Do you, down deep within the depths of your guilty soul, realize that the German government has violated Germar Rudolf’s human rights?

As the days go by, more and more people are becoming outraged by the German government’s wrongful treatment of Germar Rudolf. I am sure that you will receive numerous complaints about this. Perhaps in the future, there will be a peaceful, non-violent demonstration in front of your embassy. If US law allows us to do this, then we may just do this. If, however, US law does not allow a demonstration in front of your embassy, then we will obey the law.

My friend and colleague, Germar Rudolf, is a brilliant scholar and leader, and he is also a man of peace. As you know, he is did a thorough, airtight study of those so-called “Auschwitz gas chambers,” and showed that they never existed. Germar wants to settle this issue in peaceful, democratic debate. But, because your Fascist-Nazi government cannot refute his study with reason and facts, you have no recourse but to silence him by sending him to prison. Time and dawn of a new age of reason will show that Germar Rudolf and the Holocaust revisionist position is indeed the truth.

The present German government’s association with the lie of the “Auschwitz Gas Chambers” is actually destabilizing German society. The more you assault and degrade the German national identity with Holocaust propaganda, the more the German people will be alienated from the present form of government and look toward the “National Socialist alternative.” If you really want to prevent the development of a dictatorial National Socialist government, you would refute the Holocaust revisionists in democratic debate, rather than by imprisoning them. This would show the world that a truly democratic nation that respects minority and controversial opinion is superior to a right-wing dictatorship that suppresses freedom of speech and imprisons dissidents.

I am also enclosing a copy of my letter to the Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations, detailing the hypocrisy, double standards and corruption surrounding this Jewish Holocaust ideology. This letter was widely circulated to many parts of the world by way of the Internet. I requested that the Iranian government bring the issue of the German government’s violation of Germar Rudolf’s human rights before a UN human rights tribunal. Only time will tell if they honor my request.

Sincerely,

Paul Grubach
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Tank
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:31 pm

Postby Tank » 1 decade 4 years ago (Mon Feb 27, 2006 12:55 pm)

Dear Paul,

And he never got back in touch with you, even when you sweet talked him like that? Suprising.... :lol:


Tank

Radar
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 505
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:25 pm

Postby Radar » 1 decade 4 years ago (Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:57 pm)

Tank, you've got a long way to go if you think "sweet talk" will have any impact on these people. They are so terrified of any serious discussion that they will never allow themselves to be drawn into a response. Try it if you want.

Tank
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:31 pm

Postby Tank » 1 decade 4 years ago (Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:59 pm)

Radar,

I'm not certain what you mean by "these people", and I'm not sure you want to tell me.

What I am sure of is that nothing puts the reader on notice that a reasoned argument is not to follow more than bombast and hyperbole.

If you are going to start your letter with chest thumping, save your self both the paper and the postage and just skip it.


Tank

Radar
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 505
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:25 pm

Postby Radar » 1 decade 4 years ago (Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:02 pm)

Why Tank, I'm surprised at your question. By "these people" of course I meant the cowards who have arrested, jailed and charged Zundel and Rudolf (and in Austria, Irving). They are cowards because they use the crude force of a law which effectively denies the right of defense to silence those whose views they do not like.


Is that satisfactory?

simon1003
Member
Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 5:06 pm

Postby simon1003 » 1 decade 4 years ago (Wed Mar 01, 2006 7:15 pm)

I have to agree with Tank here, the opening sentences of Grubach's letter could have been more pragmatic -

"What is your problem, Wolfgang Ischinger? Do you, down deep within the depths of your guilty soul, realize that the German government has violated Germar Rudolf’s human rights?"

Honourable though the sentiments may be, letter writing is an art-form and pleading to the recipients soul as an opening gambit is not conducive to any sort of a balanced reply.

Tank
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:31 pm

Postby Tank » 1 decade 4 years ago (Thu Mar 02, 2006 11:55 am)

Radar,

I have to ask you what you mean by "the crude force of law"? Are not societies defined and given structure by law?


Tank

User avatar
Haldan
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 9:56 pm
Location: <secret>
Contact:

Postby Haldan » 1 decade 4 years ago (Thu Mar 02, 2006 1:16 pm)

Oh please. Stop playing a fool, Tank. You know perfectly well what Radar is writing about and you also know fully well that the laws used to imprison people who question and research the foul allegations of the 'holocaust' are nothing but desperate measures by desperate people.

Those who resort to making questioning certain aspects of history illegal definitively have something to hide and are afraid of discussion, research and open questions. This is why people are sent to prison in various European countries, because the ones who want to maintain belief in the alleged 'holocaust' cannot handle discussion or research, for had they allowed this, their alleged 'holocaust' would have and have been shown to be a lie of gigantic proportions. So what better way than criminalizing research of the 'holocaust'.

How would you feel if it were you, the Believers, who were sent to jail because you believed in the allegations of the 'holocaust'? I guess that would change your view of societies defined and given 'structure by law', wouldn't it?

-haldan

Tank wrote:Radar,

I have to ask you what you mean by "the crude force of law"? Are not societies defined and given structure by law?


Tank
<?php if ($Holocaust == false ) {deny_repeatedly(); } else { investigate(); } ?>
Homage to Catalin Haldan


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests