Where is the document for this quote?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
wtfhappenedtohess
Member
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:41 am

Where is the document for this quote?

Postby wtfhappenedtohess » 1 decade 4 months ago (Sun May 24, 2009 10:54 am)

I've seen this quote float around quite alot in the Revisionist field.. but I'm having a hard time tracking down it's physical existence..

Does anyone have a .jpeg of the original document? Does it even exist or this quote bs?


Allied Military Police HQ.
Vienna 1.10.1948 MEMO NR: 31/48

The Allied Committiee of inquiry has
to date proven that no posion gas
was ever used to kill prisoners in
the following concentration camps
Berger-Belisen, Buchenwald, Dachau
Flossenburg, Gross-Rosen,
Mauthausen and satellite camps
Natzweiler, Neuengamme
Niederhagen (Wewelsburg),
Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen,
Stutthof, Theresienstandt.

In all cases where gassings were alleged,
it could be proven that torture had
been used to extract confessions and
witnesses have lied.
Any former inmate who, during
their debriefing continues to allege
that poison gas was used to murder people
(in particular Jews), are to be reported to this
office and if they insist on lying
further, they are to be charged with
perjury.

signed Major Miller
Commanding Officer
Allied Military Police Vienna:

witnessed by Lieutenant Lachout MP


Malle
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby Malle » 1 decade 4 months ago (Sun May 24, 2009 12:02 pm)

wtfhappenedtohess wrote:I've seen this quote float around quite alot in the Revisionist field.. but I'm having a hard time tracking down it's physical existence..

Does anyone have a .jpeg of the original document? Does it even exist or this quote bs?


This document is for example at Nizkor. http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/l/ ... cument.gif
You can view it here:
Attachments
lachout-document.gif
Lachout document
I must be a mushroom - because everyone keeps me in the dark and feeds me with lots of bullshit.

Germania
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 141
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 4:48 am

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby Germania » 1 decade 4 months ago (Sun May 24, 2009 1:07 pm)

this document is a revisionist forgery, see http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/austria ... ument.html

jemand
Member
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 5:51 am
Location: Germany

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby jemand » 1 decade 4 months ago (Sun May 24, 2009 10:09 pm)

Germania wrote:this document is a revisionist forgery, see http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/austria ... ument.html

Quoting from the web page;

Whenever a new document is discovered, historical methodology demands that the document's authenticity be checked first. This is just as mandatory for contemporary history as it is for older historical periods. In our age of carbon copies or photocopies, a document's genuiness is generally proven by matching it with an authenticated original, or, lacking that, by tracing the path of the document to the issuing authority or institution. Neither method was possible in the case of the Lachout "document".

If I'm not mistaken, the same could be said about most of the Nuremberg "evidence". I hope the Holocaust people aren't using different standards here!

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9870
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 4 months ago (Mon May 25, 2009 12:41 am)

Germania wrote:this document is a revisionist forgery, see http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/austria ... ument.html

Not quite, Germania.

The Lachout Document, briefly:

The contents of this ca. 1948 document are essentially correct. Lachout nor any other signatories were ever prosecuted for 'forgery' in a country where 'holocaust denial' is illegal. Lachout was in fact compensated by the Austria govt. for false charges against him. 'Fabrication' has never been demonstrated.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

wtfhappenedtohess
Member
Member
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:41 am

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby wtfhappenedtohess » 1 decade 4 months ago (Mon May 25, 2009 3:26 am)

Hannover wrote:
Germania wrote:this document is a revisionist forgery, see http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/austria ... ument.html

Not quite, Germania.

The Lachout Document, briefly:

The contents of this ca. 1948 document are essentially correct. Lachout nor any other signatories were ever prosecuted for 'forgery' in a country where 'holocaust denial' is illegal. Lachout was in fact compensated by the Austria govt. for false charges against him. 'Fabrication' has never been demonstrated.

- Hannover


But that could imply it was simply a 'grey' document. It couldn't be proved authentic.

This document is looks dodgey to me. I think Nikzors rebuttal is quite accurate in regards to this document. Thanks for the link Germania.
Last edited by wtfhappenedtohess on Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.

KostasL
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:27 am

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby KostasL » 1 decade 4 months ago (Mon May 25, 2009 5:40 am)

Germania wrote:this document is a revisionist forgery, see http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/austria ... ument.html


Dear Germania,

I would accept that this document is a forgery, if you insist.

But this is clearly a document that might be a forgery but it's contents is true. 8)
You know there are "genuine" documents full of falsifications. :oops:

The Allied Committiee of inquiry has
to date proven that no posion gas
was ever used to kill prisoners in
the following concentration camps
Berger-Belisen, Buchenwald, Dachau
Flossenburg, Gross-Rosen,
Mauthausen and satellite camps
Natzweiler, Neuengamme
Niederhagen (Wewelsburg),
Ravensbruck, Sachsenhausen,
Stutthof, Theresienstandt.

In all cases where gassings were alleged,
it could be proven that torture had
been used to extract confessions and
witnesses have lied.


Which of the above is NOT TRUE ? :?:

The above is also admitted by the establishment.
Or we still have in doubt that there were no gassings in Dachau or that the only evidence was confessions by torture or false testimonies ? :oops:

That's a shame.

Why would a revisionist need to make such forgery, when all its contents has been considered true ?
When you realize that the Holocaust is a LIE, then all of a sudden, ALL your questions, ALL bizarre and strange things, disappear, and ALL things make sense, at last.

User avatar
six gun
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:42 pm

Re: Where is the document for this quote?

Postby six gun » 7 years 5 months ago (Mon Apr 23, 2012 9:19 am)

I have just come across this document.

The thing is the contents are accepted by all sides.

It is accepted there were no homicidal gassings in the camps under Allied control.
That those who claimed such gassings were liars.
That if they gave evidence to a court they would be committing perjury.
We know the British were dab hands at torture.

So there is nothing contentious in the document.
It is simply reiterating what we know already.
There would be no reason to forge such a document.
Had it never existed the current situation with respect to the camps under Allied control would be no different.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 1 guest