Meyer versus Meyer

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Secret Anne X
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 11:12 pm

Meyer versus Meyer

Postby Secret Anne X » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Nov 16, 2003 6:04 pm)


Someone asked about Meyer and Meyer, one who was criticized by Piper and another one who was criticized somewhere else (Yahoo?)

They are different people. Arno Meyer (sp ?) wrote a book and said three things revisionists always quote, "sources for the gas chambers are rare and unreliable", "more people died at Auschwitz and certainly overall from natural as opposed to unnatural causes" and "testimony has to be evaluated with care because its basis was extremely complex" (or something similar!)

I have never seen anyone effectively rebut Meyer's statements, though sometimes people will accuse him of being sexist, as if that has anything to do with anything!

The other Meyer is Fritjof Meyer who is a German left-winger who wrote an article last summer arguing for a lower death toll at Auschwitz among other things. Piper's article is an attempt to refute Meyer.

Pipers article basically says:

Any enclosed space could have been a gas chamber, and therefore attempts to say that any space could not have been are irrelevant,

Calculating cremation capacities is irrelevant because witnesses all say that thousands upon thousands of people could be burned every day, and even if the cremation ovens could not keep up the burning pits could burn an unlimited number of bodies, because Hoess testified to this,

But also Hoess is unreliable because he was tortured with sleep deprivation.

Piper also says that the fact that the cremation buildings had two underground morgues proves they were built to kill people, also the ventilation system.

He also winds up by saying 2 million non-Jewish Poles were exterminated in World War Two, which is demonstrably false (no more than 1/2 million Poles died in World War Two from all causes, I have read.) And he further says that the Auschwitz camp was built with an idea of gassing another five million Jews, but this didn't happen because the Germans lost the war.

All of the underlines and italics Piper uses and with his heavy dependence on witness testimonies not just to prove what happened but to prove rates of cremation etc. which are scientific matters make his article read like he's a crazy man. In my opinion, of course!

Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Postby Turpitz » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Nov 16, 2003 6:54 pm)

So what are you getting at Anne ?

You seem to think that Piper is nothing more than a money-grubber desperately trying to keep his golden calf alive.

The whole industry is a filthy lie. If the Industry wanted to shut everyone up once and for all, they would do a excavation at Auschwitz and produce the goods. But you know and I know, there is nothing in the ground at the said site, and never has been, this is why they resort to the hideous tactics of slander, suppression and blatant lies to keep their sinking vessel afloat.

If what is alleged took place at Auschwitz, don't you think there might be a little more hard physical evidence of the mammoth undertaking, than the dismall, paltry offerings that have been dished up, like some cold, putrid, convolted stew ?

User avatar
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10064
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Nov 16, 2003 11:14 pm)

Piper's thoroughly debunked assertions and Myer's attempt to hang onto to 'holocaust' lite are shown as ridiculous here:

The Rudolf Report, for one stop shopping you can't beat it.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Archie and 0 guests