Drew and Pepper, since you’re both inquiring about the same stuff, I’ll send each of you the exact same email.
As for my dropping Belzec and Chelmno from The Final Solution Forensic Challenge, at the time that I did, roberta was boasting that she would be using Kola’s claims for Sobibor and the alleged imminent archeological “investigations” at Sobibor as her basis for laying claim to the reward. In the following examples (from VNN), she’s talking (mostly) about Sobibor (You’ll know when she’s talking about Chelmno):
759 – RM: Evidence meeting the challenge requirements is expected to come along with the results of archaeological work currently being done on site. All I have to do is watch… And just to make it clear once more, I intend to publish proof meeting the requirements in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine and submit such proof to NAFCASH as soon as I have it in my hands, independently of what my chances are of ever actually seeing any reward money… 798 - RM: I for my part am waiting for current archaeological work on site to make Gerdes’ nightmares come true - 799 – RM: …I’ll try to obtain information about the provenance of this exhibit and include in the article I intend to publish in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine after gaining access to the results of current archaeological excavations. – 807 - RM: Kola seems to have made enough of his results available to the authors of the above-quoted description for them to know what he found and to plan further archaeological work at Sobibor taking advantage of Kola’s findings. Work seems to be under way to identify the outlines of the Sobibor mass graves precisely enough for implementation of the following project - 818 – RM: As to the quoted NAFCASH gibberish [concerning the changes], I like it indeed... it has also further improved my chances to gain access to the detailed findings of a certain entity that Gerdes had the imprudence to mouth off about. Their disposition to give me what will make Gerdes’ nightmares come true – 819 – RM: Your true motivation for removing Belzec and Chelmno from the challenge is obvious, Mr. Gerdes. For some reason you got cold feet regarding these two camps. But you again made a mistake, my friend. Considering what is currently happening in matters of archaeological research, you would have been better off by removing Sobibor. Sure you don’t want to reconsider? I promise I won’t hold it against you. [Smiley face] – 826 – GG: BTW Roberta, In what months issue of "SKEPTIC" magazine are we going to see your submittal? RM: But please keep showing how nervous you are about what’s happening on site, Mr. Gerdes. – 827 – RM: And please tell us, what was it that made you get cold feet regarding ARCHAEOLOGY magazine? Did Mrs. Golden accept the NAFCASH challenge and announce that she would submit evidence about the exact location and exact contents of a Chelmno mass grave as well the amount of human remains contained therein? Or did you just decide that it was better not to take chances that she or someone else might do that? – 835 – GG: If jew-lie Golden wants to accept THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE the way it was previously, which included Chelmno and Archaeology Magazine, I, and all twenty supporters will make any and all special accommodations for such an announcement. We will bend over backwards to make sure it happens. We will set up a new challenge independent of THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE, just for her. Just like we modified the FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE just to make it easier for you retardo. In fact, nafcash challenges jew-lie golden and ARCHAEOLOGY magazine to accept a Chelmno / Archaeology Magazine challenge. Perhaps you and your fellow funny boy freaks over at HC… can help nafcash make it happen. – 844 – RM: If you want to set up a separate Chelmno challenge, that’s also fine with me… Speaking for myself… I accept - 847 – Gerdes: The Chelmno / Archaeology magazine challenge is for jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine. If the faggots at HC want to join them, that's even better. But it needs to be a joint announcement. You yourself have agreed to be on that team… So get your team together Roberta. When you have jew-lie Golden and Archaeology magazine and all your fellow funnyboys at HC online, make a public challenge to nafcash. We're waiting Retardo. – 854 – RM: So there’s going to be another "major change"? GG: What do the words "new challenge - independent of" mean to you stupid? – 888 – RM: Gerdes’ mouthing-off against the above-mentioned entities may turn out to be a shot in the foot, however. I can imagine members of the Sobibor Archaeology Project or the "Friends of Sobibor Remembrance" association getting angry enough, upon reading Gerdes' crap, to decide that it's time to teach the bigmouth a lesson and publish evidence meeting the NAFCASH challenge requirements just in order to humiliate the fellow, independently of whether or not they can realistically expect payment of the reward amount. GG: When can I expect this to happen Roberta? An approximate date, if not a specific one will be fine. RM: Don't be silly, Gerdes. I can't tell you a specific or even approximate date... But one thing is sure: there's no need for anyone to hurry... - 902 – RM: Insofar as answering your questions… they will be answered in an article that I shall try to get published in SKEPTIC magazine… as soon as I have all the information together and authorization to make it public – 916 – GG: When can I expect this to happen Roberta? RM: When the archaeological work is done and the results have been evaluated… Archaeological evidence is published for the purpose of enhancing scientific and historical knowledge and for everyone’s benefit. When the results of the current archaeological investigations are published in a scientific magazine, they will include much more than just the evidence necessary to meet the NAFCASH challenge requirements. And I will see to it that Mr. Gerdes gets a free copy of the scientific magazine in which this evidence shall be published… As long as it takes for my archaeological work to be completed and duly remunerated, for the results to be evaluated and for an article that meets the requirements of a scientific magazine to be written. – 953 – RM: I didn’t exactly tell him that the results of my research would be available the day after tomorrow – on the contrary, I made it very clear that my research depended on the progress of archaeological work currently being done by the Sobibor Archaeology Project on site, that archaeological work takes time… – 1035 – RM: And as concerns the contents of the Sobibor mass graves, an archaeologist's public statement in conjunction with the known documentary and eyewitness evidence to large-scale mass murder at Sobibor is proof enough. If you want further details you’ll have to wait for the results of ongoing archaeological research by the SAP. Archaeologists work according to their own schedules regardless of how often a hysterical retard yells "let’s see", you know. – 1036 – RM: What I’m waiting for, you ask? I’m waiting for time and means to go to Sobibor, obtain permission to disturb the ash heap (which I doubt will be granted) and enlist the services of an expert to analyze the human remains and certify that they are in fact human remains (which I also doubt anyone will do for just little me). So waiting for what comes of an assessment of the mass graves’ contents by the SAP and/or for a detailed report by Prof. Kola seems a more promising approach. – 1092 - That’s correct insofar as Kola has not yet published a detailed report… the SAP's work is still under way... All that future archaeological reports will do is provide further information about that mass murder. Get used to the idea, Mr. Gerdes… mass murder at Sobibor has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And as time goes by, archaeology will provide further information about it.
And yada yada yada. Up to, during and after the time those changes were made in The Final Solution Forensic Challenge, most of what roberta was yammering on about was Sobibor, and how she was going to use the information from the upcoming “investigation” to lay claim to the reward and “make my nightmares come true,” etc. And that was the major reason for making the changes, so she couldn’t back out from her boasts and to put a spotlight on the fraudulent “investigation” by Yoram Hymie and the SAP. In fact, had I not put so much time and effort into Treblinka, I would have made Sobibor the one and only camp in The Final Solution Forensic Challenge in order to really force the issue. As I said in this post on the codoh forum:
“FYI... I really hated to drop Belzec and Chelmno, but I felt the time was right to focus and force the issue about Sobibor. Of course, this means that someone else can pick up the Belzec and Chelmno balls that I dropped and do something with them. Especially Chelmno, which is not only a gift, but if the fraudulent "archeological investigation" there isn't used to our advantage, then the next generation of truthers are going to hold us in contempt. In fact, I believe the BS "archeological investigations" of Chelmno are the easiest of all to prove as fraudulent and can most easily be used to our advantage.”
Also note that everything roberta said about chelmno was pure conjecture. Not a peep about any real evidence that jew-lie golden or roberta herself “had on me.” And notice that all her conjectural statements were in the form of questions: “What was it...? Did she...? Was it that...? Did Mrs. Golden...? Or did you...?” etc. She was simply spewing verbal diarhea. (Has anything else ever come out of that pathological liars mouth?) Also notice that jew-lie Golden had much time to lay claim to the reward while Chelmno was a part of The Final Solution Forensic Challenge, as did roberta herself. And every single email that I sent to Archaeology Magazine staffers was totally ignored. Not one single reply to one single question regarding jew-lie golden and her fraudulent article. Jew-lie golden and Archaeology Magazine have been running from me and the subject of Chelmno over the years almost as shamelessly as shermer and “skeptic” magazine and the HC freaks.
And let’s not forget the questions about Chelmno that roberta and her HC butt-buddies ran away from on rodoh. Check out the - Nick does Chelmno - thread. So who got cold feet? If roberta “had something” on me about Chelmno, then why did she run away from those simple Chelmno (and Sobibor) questions – on her own turf?
And how is roberta coming along on The Final Solution Forensic Challenge with all that acheological evidence uncovered by the SAP? She was awfully sure of herself there, wasn’t she? So what happened? It’s been well over a year now since roberta accepted The Final Solution Forensic Challenge. Did she get cold feet? Check out these statements by roberta herself:
"Boy, one can sense how carpet-biting mad Gerdes is at my having accepted the challenge... You will hear from me again on this subject when you find an issue of SKEPTIC or ARCHEOLOGY magazine with an article about my research findings in your mailbox... I’m doing my research independently of how big a chance there is that meeting the challenge requirements will get me any money. If I don’t get paid for submitting proof that objectively meets the challenge requirements, that’s fine. If I do get paid, that’s even better... but the next time you repeat that "looking for an angle out" - BS you’ll be telling another lie, asshole. I have already made clear that the reward money would be nice to have but is not the main motivation for my research... What made me decide to accept your challenge was a big mistake you made in one of your posts, one that considerably improved my chances of having access to the very evidence that is required to meet the challenge requirements... If you don’t want to accept my suggestions... that’s just fine with me. It won’t dissuade me from trying to obtain, publish and present to NAFCASH the required proof, for as you well know the money issue is secondary to me... As you well know, I’m not trying to change anything to my "liking"... what I’m showing the world is that I’m willing to play by the standards of the NAFCASH challenge... And just to make it clear once more, I intend to publish proof meeting the requirements in ARCHAEOLOGY or SKEPTIC magazine and submit such proof to NAFCASH as soon as I have it in my hands, independently of what my chances are of ever actually seeing any reward money. If I meet the challenge requirements but cannot obtain payment... that’s fine. If I can obtain payment, that’s even better.”
So who got cold feet? Where are the articles that roberta promised she would submit to “skeptic” and Archaeology magazines? What exactly has roberta “shown the world,” other than the fact that she’s a mentally ill, emotionally disturbed freak? Wouldn’t you agree that it was roberta who was the one that got cold feet?
OK, that’s enough for the time being. I’ll get to the subject of Belzec next.
Is "roberta" the biggest coward on the planet or what?