Do revisionists have an advantage?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Malle
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:53 pm
Location: Sweden

Do revisionists have an advantage?

Postby Malle » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sat Dec 21, 2002 8:36 pm)

They certainly do!

I was over to the Third Reich Forum. I found this thread "Holocaust & Warcrimes"

http://www.thirdreichforum.com/phpBB2/v ... p?p=107341

Here we have the "Old Fighter Roberto" who is trying to patronise anyone that don't agree with the Holocaust Standard story. But this fighter with 3071 posts hasn't read Elie Wiesels books!! I have compiled it to the post below.

Alexx post:
Roberto wrote:
Wiesel's injured foot was even operated on by the camp surgeon

He injured his little foot. I am so sorry to hear that. I wonder how it happend...?

Perhaps, when he played soccer at the sportsfield ?
Or perhaps, when he jumped into the Auschwitz swimmingpool ?

Perhaps, at the theater, he may have stumbled on the stage, when rehersing a Shakespeare- play.

Perhaps, someone accidently dropped the tuba on his foot in the Auschwitz-orchestra.
Or, could it have happend in the library, when he was reading ?

I don't think it happend in the Auschwitz-bordello, he was a bit to young for that...

It is not generally known, that all these facilities were available for the Auschwitz prisoners.
Sportsfields, swimmingpool, theater, orchestras, library, post-office and a bordello.

Roberto knows it of course, and the nizkorists, but they don't want to talk about it.
Am I saying Auschwitz was a holiday camp ? No, certainly not. It was a extremly hard labour-camp.

/Alexx

Ps. So the nazis operated his foot at the Birkenau-hospital. I am so relieved to hear that. So he could follow the nazis when evacuated.

Robertos answer:
Alexx wrote:
It is not generally known, that all these facilities were available for the Auschwitz prisoners.
Sportsfields, swimmingpool, theater, orchestras, library, post-office and a bordello.

In what "Revisionist" comic book did you read that?

I assume that certain entertainment facilities were available for the SS guards and the so-called "Lagerprominenz" (camp prominents - about 1-2% of the inmates, camp senior, block senior, prisoners' doctors etc.), who were usually German political prisoners or criminals.

But I strongly doubt that such facilities were accessible to the "Middle Class" (people who had functions, such as "Stubenälteste" - room seniors, nurses etc. - about 8-9% of the inmates, who nevertheless lived under much better conditions than the mass of prisoners), let alone to the normal prisoners, the mass who lived under horrible conditions and were prone to die of hard work, insufficient food and ill-treatment unless they managed to rise into the midle class or even the prominent personage of the camp.
Alexx wrote:
Roberto knows it of course, and the nizkorists, but they don't want to talk about it.

No, I don't how Wiesel got injured. I haven't read any of Wiesel's works.

But I have read the autobiography of Rudolf Höss, in Appendix One of which the man wrote the following (translation by Constantine FitzGibbon, 2000 Phoenix Press, London, pages 192 and following):
[...]Because of the increasing insistence of the Reichsführer SS on the employment of prisoners in the armaments industry, Obergruppenführer Pohl found himself compelled to resort to Jews who had become unfit for work. The order was given that if the latter could be made fit and employable within six weeks, they were to be given special care and feeding.[emphasis mine] Up to then all Jews who had become incapable of working were gassed with the next transports, or killed by injection if they happened to be lying ill in the sick block.[...]


Alexx wrote:
Am I saying Auschwitz was a holiday camp ? No, certainly not. It was a extremly hard labour-camp.

Why, a true believer letting off some steam.

I can understand you're moved by the philosopher's tearful goodbye, but do you really think some more "Revisionist" bullshit will improve his image, or your own?

Alexx answer:
Roberto wrote:
No, I don't how Wiesel got injured.

If you read my post again, you will find that I am not very interested in how Mr Elie Wiesel got injured. It was just a vehicle I used.
Roberto wrote:
I haven't read any of Wiesel's works.

That is very revealing, Roberto. Haven't read any of the books by the most prominent and featured holocaust witness of them all !

You should, Roberto. Revisionists find it to be a very educational experience, indeed. And if, you would like to call his works a "Revisionist comic book". I will not argue against it.
Roberto wrote:
Why, a true believer letting off some steam

Are we not trying to mud the waters here, Roberto ? I thougt that I was the sceptic and you the believer.
What is it that I am supposed to believe in, that you apparently do not ?
Roberto wrote:
will improve his image, or your own?

Spot on, Roberto ! This is what my post was about. The image. Not my image. But rather the Auschwitz image.
All this about theatres, orchestras and Sportsfields doesn't fit into the Auschwitz image.
Regards Alexx :)

User avatar
Sailor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2002 6:54 pm
Location: California

Postby Sailor » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sat Dec 21, 2002 9:29 pm)

Malle wrote: Roberto [...]

Actually the man is quite smart. Too bad that he is seriously infected by the holocausticus bacillus severus (pardon my Latin, it is a bit rusty after all these years).
He should seek treatment. Unforunately I have no access to his forum.
:cry:

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9842
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 6 years ago (Sun Dec 22, 2002 12:16 am)

Yep, so smart that he believes in allegations which defy laws of science.

So smart that he believes in the absurd alleged "confessions" of commandant Hoess which make no sense, and were acquired by torture.

So smart that he believes that the complete lack of physical evidence for the alleged murders 6,000,000 Jews and alleged 6,000,000 'others' doesn't matter.

So smart that he believes that the Nuremberg trials were fair trials, where, as the Nuremberg charter states ..."The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence"

All this after he has been shown better information. Smart, but yet the guy believes in nonsense, okay.

- Hannover


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests