If the tattoo was critical for Elie Wiesel, nevertheless, exists for him easily the possibility to fake this just as one likes. It will probably arrange no court a forensic investigation of the tattoo and even if, nevertheless, we should know everybody who will explain then the investigation!
Elie Wiesel can make way according to the circumstances playing easily to every reproach! Even if he had stated, the tattoo is not there any more! He only needs to state that he has only believed with the fact that it was not to be seen "almost" any more.
Though the tattoo history is proving for insiders of course. But insiders know this also without tattoo. And the average citizen will hardly understand the meaning of the tattoo anyhow. And even if he understands it, statement stands against statement / forgery. And, moreover, becomes like I already said, the maintained mass murder not disproved. Only Elie Wiesel is exposed at best as a liar. But there are "1000" other witnesses.
With my cup of coffee, but please with cream, it looks completely different against it. With it the quintessential point of the HC is attacked, the best of all testified gas chambers. And not only this! The murderous deed is treated directly itself. And this under full recognition of all witness's statements! Even the holes in the gas chamber cover are recognised. And also the fact of the only technology which was maintained of several stuffs for which even documents of different kind exist. And even culprit's witness's statements. Even the statement of Rudolf Höss is recognised.
All this is recognised and the cup of coffee, but please with cream, an absolute evidential value still has. And it is able from everybody without somebody to have to believe be checked even with the coffee drinking (but please with cream)!
Holocaust-deniers reject that these columns even existed. The convergence of this evidence, including the compelling testimonies giving details before corroborating documentary evidence was unearthed, is ignored.
Kula's and Tauber's depositions describing the "wire-mesh insertion devices," decades before the corroborating documentary evidence was discovered in the archives, cannot be explained away. Houstek/Erber's description of the same devices, also before that evidence was discovered, is also a powerful corroboration.
Deniers will likely argue that the minor differences in their descriptions mean we should ignore them. But should we really expect to find identical accounts? The prisoners gave their descriptions months after the fact; the perpetrator, 35 years later. That may account for some of the difference. Just as importantly, we do not know if the Nazis in charge of the gassing operation tried slightly different types of equipment from time to time.
Indeed, if all three descriptions were exactly alike, we might suspect that the later account was copied from the earlier ones. Because they are not, we know that here are three separate eyewitnesses to these items.
Holocaust-deniers reject the validity of the aerial photographs, claiming that the four dark spots on the roof of each gas chamber were retouchings added by the CIA or some other conspiracy. John Ball, who has no expertise in interpreting aerial photographs, suggests either that hypothesis or, alternatively, that the dark spots were flowerpots sitting on each gas chamber.
The objects shown on the roof in the ground photo, say some deniers, are ordinary boxes of construction material.
Deniers also claim that there is no evidence of four holes in the roof of each gas chamber. Because the chambers were dynamited in an attempt to hide evidence of mass murder from the approaching Soviet army, the roofs have collapsed and it is difficult to tell in the rubble what is a hole and what is not. Later this year, an essay on this website will address this question in detail.
Finally, Holocaust-deniers intentionally confuse the solid support columns for the gas chamber roof with the wire-mesh columns. As obvious evidence of their crimes, the latter would have been removed by the Nazis from the gas chambers before they were blown up. Ludicrously, deniers show photos of the solid columns as proof that the wire-mesh columns never existed.
Such feeble attempts to rewrite history do not stand. http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschw ... o-columns/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3EeTFtY ... r_embedded
This is a virtual reconstruction of the Crematorium II, in Auschwitz-Birkenau. It is an educational project and I'm using a "real time" technology.
I'm a brazilian history teacher and my first goal is allow my students to "walk" in the building, to understand the various objectives of it, and the ways this building - and the whole Auschwitz complex - fits the nazi ideology, the Holocaust, and the WWII context.....
Still a thought, dear Carolyn Yeager:
If Elie Wiesel can repulse the attack on the tattoo as on top described what we make then?