Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
sans concession
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 143
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:48 am

Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby sans concession » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:12 pm)

Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

22/10/10

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-storie ... -22650172/


It stands as the starkest reminder of the Nazi genocide machine.

The Auschwitz extermination camp, where more than a million died during the Second World War, was the chilling centre-piece of Hitler's Final Solution.

But today the camp is rotting away and needs a £120million restoration if it is to be preserved as a haunting yet necessary memorial to the inhumane horrors inflicted on its prisoners.

As one British volunteer put it: "It's a warning to the world that the Holocaust should never happen again."

The wooden guard towers here are splintering and the barracks - where up to 10 prisoners were forced to cram into each slatted bunk - are falling down.

Auschwitz, liberated more than 65 years ago by Soviet troops, was built on boggy ground between two rivers in southern Poland by untrained prisoners.

So the high groundwater and bad drainage has rotted the foundations.

The worst affected part is Auschwitz II - Birkenau - which is just a short drive from the main complex.

On arrival there, the infamous main entrance dubbed the Gate To Hell dominates the flat landscape.

The sheer scale of the death camp, which stretches as far as the eye can see, is shocking.

This place was literally the end of the line for the Jews who arrived by rail in their thousands. Families were separated on the platform into two groups by the flick of a Gestapo finger.

The weak, ill or disabled were taken to one of four huge gas chambers, where their lives were extinguished.

The crumbling remnants of Auschwitz stand as a grim lesson.

But Rafal Pióro, deputy director of the museum, says: "The conservationists say we need to start work in the next two years if we are to avert irreparable decay, so we need to act now.

"This place today has more and more meaning, because there are now fewer survivors and witnesses to what happened - the place is the witness."

For the relatives of those killed here, it is vitally important that the world does not forget what took place.

Yet the task facing those struggling to repair the camp for future generations to see is huge and daunting. Walls are blissaving tering and starting to lean, roof frames are buckling, the plasterwork and paint on the walls is flaking.

The concrete floors are full of deep cracks from the annual frosts and the wear of hundreds of thousands of visitors tramping around the site every year.

The decay at Birkenau is clear to see.

Just four of the 45 brick barracks buildings are now deemed safe for members of the public to visit.

Wooden struts are all that prevent them from collapsing and museum workers must constantly dig out the drainage canals to stop flooding.

For the museum, it is a massive undertaking.

It oversees 155 buildings, some 300 ruins and other remnants - including the four gas chambers and crematoria that are of particular historical significance.


Estimates put the repair of each barrack room at £78,000 and the 27 wooden guard towers need to be reinforced at an annual cost, for the next 14 years, of £62,000.

Our guide at Auschwitz, Pawel Sawicki, explains: "The Birkenau part of the museum is in particular need of repair, it is very badly damaged.

"The prisoners' barracks stand on marshy ground and the soil there is moving all the time.

"The building's foundations are cracking during each spring thaw, each year getting worse and worse until more and more simply falls away.

"Add to that the sheer volume of people walking around in the camp, people from all over the world who feel a great need to come here to pay tribute and to see Auschwitz for themselves. With every year that passes it gets harder and harder to patch up the buildings and make them safe for people to visit."

Displayed on many of the barracks are signs saying "Closed for Conservation".

Interestingly, these were donated to the museum by generous Barry Miles, who runs a sign-making firm in Gloucester.

He offered his services for free and regularly sends new signs in the post.

"It's with the help of people like Barry that we are able to keep the museum going," says Pawel. The theft last year of Auschwitz's sinister sign declaring Arbeit Macht Frei (work sets you free) underlined the hard task for those trying to preserve the death camp.

Barry, 42, adds: "It is terrible that the museum is falling into disrepair.

"Every country in Europe has a responsibility to keep the museum going. It stands as a warning to the world that the Holocaust should never happen again."

Barry offered the services of his familyowned business Hanman Split after visiting the museum with his brother last year. "We were both deeply affected by what we saw. I can't afford to make a donation so I said I would make them some signs."

So far, the museum has raised £81million. Germany has pledged £60million, the USA £15million and Austria £6million - but Britain has yet to step in with a contribution. Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown visited the camp in April last year and, plainly upset by what he had seen, promised: "We will join with other countries in supporting the retention of the memorial at Auschwitz."

It was believed Britain could come up with £10million - but David Cameron has not yet honoured the pledge.

And with the axe falling on public spending in Britain, the museum fears that money will not be not forthcoming.

Museum deputy director Rafal says: "We are still talking with the British government about whether they are willing to help with the costs."

The funding drive was launched after a review of the condition of the site.

Rafal insists Auschwitz could not simply be given a makeover because that would undermine its claims to authenticity.

"We know if we don't get more money we won't be able to present this authentic place to future generations.

"To run the museum we need about £5million a year. And that's just on a basic level. It is certainly not enough to preserve the site on a long-term basis.

"We feel responsible for the place and the message this place can give to everyone who wishes to visit the site."

With £120million needed for long-term conservation of the camp, Rafal also points to the preservation of the masses of property taken from prisoners before they were gassed which are now exhibited at the museum.

It has 460 artificial limbs, to 80,000 pairs of shoes, 40kg of discarded spectacles, 260 prayer garments and 3,800 suitcases which belonged to those who ended their journey in Auschwitz. Eight full-time conservationists work to preserve each item.

Rafal adds: "The work must be constant and systematic so that the survival time of the object is as long as possible."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Photos from the "Terrible" Concentration Camp of Auschwitz

Brothel, Clinic, Library, Maternity Ward ...

Send a Card to Imprisonned Revisionists

We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements.

ADDRESSES

The Warden
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: 'Murica!

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby The Warden » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:55 pm)

You would think if something caused so much "pain and horror", they would just bulldoze the place to keep people from being reminded.
That would cover up their piss-poor and lack of evidences as well.

Just more material that shows the only thing they're interested in is the "victim industry" and funding.
Why the Holocaust Industry exists:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2A81P6YGw_c

joachim neander
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:39 pm

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby joachim neander » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Sun Oct 24, 2010 4:26 pm)

As I said in another post, Birkenau was not conceived to exist in eternity, much was only done makeshift, and the material used for building was of the worst quality.
When, in the 1960s, first considerations were made how to commemorate Birkenau, distinguished artists proposed to let nature take over the whole camp, to leave only a few roads for visitors.

Barrington James
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 362
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:26 pm

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby Barrington James » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:57 pm)

Wouldn't it be better just to put the money into Gaza. It's bigger, more desparate, it has weekly murders by a variey of weapons from helicopers to tanks, and best of all it has a million of more real live starving internees. For those who are faint of heart there are plenty of arm chairs on the surunding hills in which you can watch the shows. From there you can see the effects of defenseless humans trying to save themselves from the latest USA weapons of war. Not only that, there is the possiblity of seeing an attack of the Israeli army on a incoming humanitarion relief boat. It also has great wall and thousands of destroyed buildings: homes, schools, hospitals, farms, .... And a history going back over 60 years..Beat that Auschwitz.
You can fool too many of the people most of the time.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby Hektor » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:18 am)

joachim neander wrote:As I said in another post, Birkenau was not conceived to exist in eternity, much was only done makeshift, and the material used for building was of the worst quality.
When, in the 1960s, first considerations were made how to commemorate Birkenau, distinguished artists proposed to let nature take over the whole camp, to leave only a few roads for visitors.

You mean like this ones for "gas chamber doors":

ImageImage

:bootyshake:

joachim neander
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:39 pm

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby joachim neander » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:13 am)

@ Hektor. Birkenau?

Petschau
Member
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 7:48 am

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby Petschau » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:56 am)

We are led to believe that Auschwitz must be preserved as a symbol of man's inhumanity to his brethren, with the rallying cry of "Never Again"!
Yet, all one needs to is see the events occurring in Gaza, perpetrated by these same so-called victims to realize that this reasoning for preserving Auschwitz is not true.
The intent is strictly to keep Israel's self-proclaimed eternal victimization at the forefront.

If this goes through, the monies gathered will surely be used to alter the facilities in an effort to support the original claims.
Just as at other alleged death camps where piles of rocks are thrown on top of so-called mass graves and called monuments (preventing any investigation thereof). Auschwitz reconstruction will surely enhance the carnival atmosphere further.

Carolyn Yeager
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:55 pm

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby Carolyn Yeager » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:39 pm)

To Barrington James and Hector:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

To Joachim Neander:
Are you saying that the other camps were built better than Birkenau? Only Birkenau was shoddy, built with inferior lumber, etc? And are you saying you really believe there were such places as homicidal gas chambers?
You have never seen a homicidal gas chamber at Birkenau; you have only been told about them. Why are you so ready to b-e-l-i-e-v-e ....?

To Petschau:
You are so right that Gaza completely and forever disqualifies their cry of "Never Again." They are doing it "again" themselves. Brilliant point. Better to let the place fall to ruin. It's the Poles who want to preserve it for their tourist industry. And just as the Holo Industry functions, they want to rope the entire world into paying for it as a "world treasure." :bootyshake: Sue me.
In Jewish history there are no coincidences ... Elie Wiesel
Learn more at http://eliewieseltattoo.com

Auschwitz: The Underground Guided Tour http://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-unde ... uided-tour

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3358
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby Hektor » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:08 pm)

joachim neander wrote:@ Hektor. Birkenau?
Was the quality there better or worse?

joachim neander
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:39 pm

Re: Auschwitz needs £120million restoration

Postby joachim neander » 9 years 3 weeks ago (Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:51 pm)

@ Hektor: My question was whether the wooden doors etc. on the pictures you show are at Birkenau? I don't remember to have seen them there.

@ C. Yeager:
Are you saying that the other camps were built better than Birkenau? Only Birkenau was shoddy, built with inferior lumber, etc? And are you saying you really believe there were such places as homicidal gas chambers?

1. Please tell me when and where I said this?
2. Apart from no.1: Yes, there were camps (some, not all) that were built much better than Birkenau, e.g. Dachau. Or the Auschwitz main camp and its extension (Lagererweiterung). still today use as a residential area.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot], Pon and 3 guests