'hollow posts' for cyanide in 'gas chambers' debunked

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10066
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

'hollow posts' for cyanide in 'gas chambers' debunked

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 6 years ago (Wed Apr 07, 2004 9:59 pm)

Yet another element indicating 'gas chambers' fraud can be found in the columns which supported the morgues. These morgues are absurdly said to have been 'gas chambers'. These morgues were attached to the crematorium, the crematorium were built to fight typhus epidemics.

The columns were allegedly hollow, allowing the Zyklon-B to be dropped down into them. They supposedly led to bizarre wire-mess devices which allegedly exposed the Zyklon-B to thousands of people at a time.

This lie is just one the many aspects of the gassing claims which Revisionist have utterly refuted. Have a look here at some text & photos courtesy of THE COMMITTEE FOR HISTORICAL TRUTH at:
www.air-photo.com

- Hannover
It was alleged by important "eye-witnesses" who testified at post-war trials that cyanide pellets were dropped down hollow posts where gas then escaped into the room through wire-mesh-covered openings. This was also displayed on the large Auschwitz museum camp-model before it was removed in 1991. This is false as the posts are all solid cement. (photo: 1997)

Image
At No. 3 cremation building solid cement posts also protrude through the collapsed roof again proving cyanide pellets could not have been poured down hollow posts. (photo 1997)

Image
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 10066
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 6 years ago (Thu Apr 08, 2004 2:05 am)

for example:
So called 'eyewitness' Filip Friedman wrote of 'hollow pillars in all four corners, and when the chamber was full, gas bombs were dropped into the pillars from above'.

Filip Friedman is a liar.

- H.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

rrohde
Member
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 10:52 pm

Postby rrohde » 1 decade 6 years ago (Mon Apr 12, 2004 12:04 pm)

What's interesting in this regard is also the fact that to efficiently "gas" (and I mean gassing against lice in de-lousing chambers) with Zyklon-B, one had to use a warm-air-blower that would blow air of a certain temperature against the granulates containing the gas. The warm airflow was required to actually get the gas to work in the first place (seperate the gas from the carrier)... {read that in "The Revisionist", Volume 1}

Dropping the pelets simply on the floor or into "hollow posts" wouldn't really have done much in the alledged time it took to allegdly kill a room full of people...

I am not sure if any warm-air-blower was ever mentioned in the alledged gas-chambers.....

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 979
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Postby Turpitz » 1 decade 6 years ago (Wed Apr 14, 2004 4:19 pm)

It can be quite complicated but In stonemason terms they are known as supporting 'pillars' if free-standing and generally slender in relation to their height, and support an overhead structure. If attached to another structure then they are 'pillasters'. A column is a pillar of circular section. A column is tapered (entasis) toward the top about two-thirds the way up. A 'pier' in stonemasons terms are the free-standing intermediate supports of an arcade. In bricklayers/masons language they are known as reinforced concrete supporting piers. They are also 'isolated piers' meaning they are free standing, rather than 'attached piers' which are tied into a structure. Because these are made of concrete, and the buildings are composed of brick units and not natural stone, they are 'isolated piers'.

There is nothing sinister about these piers, they are a basic fundamental when supporting overhead masses. An absolute Prerequisite when concerned with heavy flat roofs. Pitched roofs are not so concerned with supporting piers as their loads are lateral rather than vertical. A pitched roof wants to push at the bottom, sideways, whilst a flat roof wants to push straight down.

The reason they were in the morgue is extremely obvious. They were to support the mass of the roof slab at it's weakest point, at the centre of it's span (unless they are supporting concrete or steel joists/lintols that span the building, or other load bearing internal walls to pick up the roof slab at various intervals. In which case the piers will be kicked over to the obvious central position.) Concrete has incredible compressive strength, but is very weak under tensile load, i.e. It cannot tolerate being bent.

If you imagine yourself in the Krema looking up at the underside of the roof slab (also reinforced concrete). imagine the strain on the massive roof slab in the middle of the room ? All that weight wanting to sag and bend in the middle. So taking into consideration concrete is very weak under tensile load, you put reinforced concrete piers in to support it.

Another obvious flaw in their lies, is that the diameter of the piers is very small, so small in fact, that if these piers were hollow, it would have made the pier walls very thin , which would render them extremely weak and totally useless. Hence they were solid and reinforced with steel to strengthen them enough to serve their purpose as structural supports.

Every decent Architect or Builder would know this, but they are all to frightened to speak up and face the demented fury of Zionist wrath, as they resort to vile tactics which enable them to cling desperately to their mythical 'Six Million' Talmud dream.

What a load of bollocks all this industry claptrap is !

Turpitz
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 979
Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 12:57 pm

Postby Turpitz » 1 decade 6 years ago (Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:04 pm)

Krema II clearly showing the structural purpose of piers, they are even being used to carry the bottom collar of the pitched roof trusses. They are also in the main Krema room where the ovens are.

Notice the careful centralised spacing of these piers to make them as efficent as possible, and aid even load distribution.

At number '9' we can see a massive concrete member has also been used to bear the load.

Do they suggest HCN was lowered through the roof at number '9' ?

bizzare !


Piers, piers everywhere...But not a gas chamber to be found.


Image


http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/camps/aus ... uction.jpg


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests