borjastick wrote:Milosovic and his boys did in fact slaughter thousands of Muslims in the region
The fact is, all parties were guilty to some degree in the mess of 1990s-Yugoslavia. It was never as simple as "Milosevic and the Bosnian-Serb militias were ethnically cleansing millions of people, but NATO heroically stopped them". This is an appealing narrative. It is. People want it.
borjastick wrote:What's more is the bodies of thousands of murdered Muslims were then found, dug up along with the proof of their mass murder.
You refer to the "Srebrenica Massacre". Some scholarship casts doubt on the narrative NATO and the Bosnian Muslims presented to the world in the 1990s. Just google around for Srebrenica+hoax to see some of it.
Here is a good synopsis. Its Wikipedia article even gives
the revisionist position a fair hearing. One of the revisionists is UN General MacKenzie, hardly a crank. I think the revisionist case is strong.
My understanding of the "Srebrenica Revisionist" position: It is a hoax because of (1) Inflated numbers, (2) Attributing large-scale genocidal intentions where none existed, (3) The mechanics of what happened are all wrong in our narrative -- The Muslims who died were almost entirely combatants (militia) who attempted a breakout during a siege. The failure of the breakout allowed the Serbs to mow down the retreating Muslims, with up to 2,000 dying during the retreat. This is what happens, sometimes, in war. Isolated ad-hoc killings or prisoners or even civilians occurred, true (as in every war), and by all sides, but not just by the Serbs. This event is really much more complicated than we were/are told.
Srebrenica is off-topic, but may be indirectly relevant to the Jewish Holocaust story. To the extent that that the revisionists (like General MacKenzie) are correct and Srebrenica is a "hoax", it should be studied by Holocaust revisionists.
It is a mini-Holocaust-narrative. It is better documented than the supposed Jewish Holocaust of 50 years earlier, so studying the Srebrenica story could even shed light on the Jewish "Holocaust" story, how it started, and spread. Denierbud played up the shameless lies told in 1990 about Iraqi soldiers murdering Kuwaiti babies, and compared them to the Holocaust story. (The difference, of course, is that the Kuwaiti stories were proven false by open investigation later in 1991, after the war, but nothing like that was allowed in the Soviet camps...) The same in principle is true of Srebrenica. Postwar political considerations demanded that the narrative be upheld at all costs, and few other than ethnic-Serbs and Western dissident seekers-of-the-truth have even bothered looking into it.
_________________________________
What is for sure is that the "pop-narrative of WWII" I allude to above also applies to Bosnia/Kosovo. "Hitler invaded a series of countries solely to kill their Jews, until we heroically stopped him and liberated the camps". "The Serbs invaded a series of semi-autonomous regions solely to kill Muslims [etc.], until NATO heroically stopped them". A form of this narrative is playing out again in Syria...