Wishful thinking. As I said a million times, there are countless photos, there were tens of thousands of cremated corpses, no chimneys can be demonstrated as smoking. Just saying that in normal operation the chimneys gave off smoke is is hardly the same as showing that they gave off smoke. An inconvenient fact that refuses to go away.Let´s give it a try for one more time and I hope that my comment will stay here this time. For treatment´s of the "issue" I direct readers to my comments starting on page 1 of this thread, nothing new and relevant since then and crematoria did smoke during their operation. I again repeat, there is no known photo with smoking chimney of Auschwitz-Birkenau crematoria because crematoria were not active when the photos known so far were taken. So please, stop requesting such photo.
Bob, the core of your problem here lies in your saying "Nine photos against three, I think that this is not a problem of detection or quality - crematoria are not active.". This means you are making a false assumption about cremations not occurring based upon only 9 photos, when in fact you know there are countless photos. There is no error to admit, at least not from my end.If I count correctly, we have some 9 high quality photos, (aerial + ground) covering period of Summer 1943, May, August, September 1944. We have only three low quality photos and one (August 20) which stands in the middle I guess. Nine photos against three, i think that this is not a problem of detection or quality - crematoria are not active."
So as you can clearly read, I am clearly pointing out there are more than 9 photos, but this was not issue in the debate with "friedrichjansson," we debated if photos are able to detect chimney smoke because of their quality so the issue was quality of photos, and as clearly visible, number 9 refers exclusively to high quality photos and not to total number which I myself pointed out to be higher. Will Hannover admit his error an apologize?
This one again:
This is false since if crematoria did not smoke during their operation, everyone can arbitrary claim that intensive cremations are taking place in the crematoria but cannot be seen. This is of course false and serious assertion, read my comments again
Simple one, if the crematory chimneys did not smoke during normal operation then indeed one would not see smoke, which is exactly what the photos tell us. Unless shown otherwise this is true since there are no smoking chimneys in any photo, not one. If you find the problem to be serious then that is your problem. As said, this debate is a side show, small beer to the enormity of the facts on the side of Revisionists.
I've re-read the thread Ad nauseam. The clear evidence and argument is the lack of smoke in the endless photos. Imagine 'smoking chimneys' that magically do not show up on film. Incredible! Rather like vampire and mirrors.If somebody has a study, evidence, arguments that crematoria did not produce smoke during operation, please show them otherwise there is no basis for this assertion whereas there are many facts used for demonstration that they emitted smoke, re-read the thread.
Show me photos of smoking chimneys and the debate ends. What do they say in Missouri? You got it, "Show Me".
The tide is turning.