Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Hannover » 3 years 8 months ago (Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:27 pm)

Forum participant Werd briefly referred to this devastating work by Carlo Mattogno here:
Olodogma's 1000th post. It's about Yad Vashem database

Afer reading it I thought a thread about it would be helpful in understanding just how fraudulent the Yad Vashem Database really is.
This is a translation from Italian.
Comments invited, read on.

- Hannover

http://translate.google.com/translate?d ... riportati/

Image

"Olodogma"

November 19, 2013

A brief note on "The Central Database of Shoah Victims' Names" and the number of deaths reported therein

Image

carlo, Mattogno, books, studies, work, revisionism, historian, Auschwitz gas chambers, healthcare lager L ' article "The (re) construction documents and history WEB" 1 exposes undoubtedly real and serious problems, but not the only, or even the most important.

Worthy of note is the comment from a reader about the "database" of Yad Vashem (which would record 'names and biographical data of two-thirds of the six million Jews murdered by the Nazis and their accomplices. Two million are yet to be identified' 2 , ie, in total, approximately 4 million), but more for the problems he (indirectly) places, and for those who believe to resolve:

"Even if a million names have been invented out of whole cloth, then remain millions more names documented in detail":

what it means in practice 'names documented in detail "?

The question, in more explicit terms, be expressed thus: what are the sources that identify the names of Holocaust victims?

If it's "Jews murdered by the Nazis and their accomplices," given that there is no documentarily name allegedly gassed (because there is no documentary proof of the "gas chambers" and "gassing"), and there are no lists of names of Jews shot by the Einsatzgruppen denominated in units of the Police, remain only the lists of Jews killed in retaliation, by order of the SS courts, in escape attempts etc., category, from the numerical point of view, extremely small.

If we speak of Jews dead, there are two main groups of documentary sources:

1) the list of deaths in concentration camps (especially Sterbebücher, registers of deaths, Totenbücher, records of the dead)

2) the lists of deaths in the ghettos.

These deaths fall into what the SS called "natural mortality".

It is difficult to numerically evaluate these deaths names. We know with certainty, from a letter of Sonderstandesamt Arolsen of 11 May 1979, until 1978, the number of these deaths found in all German concentration camps was 217,304.

This figure includes inmates obviously Jews and non-Jews.

The subsequent delivery by the Russian authorities of the registers of deaths at Auschwitz Museum has brought the number of deaths names for this field from 52 389 to 68 864, which does not change anything in the big picture. The ghettos, there are general information. Among the larger ones, to Warsaw are documented 10,000 deaths names, Lodz perhaps all about 47,000 to Theresienstadt and perhaps all of the approximately 34,000. Adding any lists of names of the deaths of other ghettos, hardly one would arrive at 350,000.

So where to jump out the alleged four million names?

In part, from the lists of prisoners in concentration camps and in the alleged extermination camps; in the "database" of Yad Vashem people deported from which there is no further news is ipso facto considered killed ("fizzy") on the date of arrival of the transport.

However, it is highly doubtful that lists names of transport that are stored contain at least [4000000-350000 =] 3,650,000 names. The most important names repertoires (Germany, France, Belgium, Theresienstadt, Netherlands) include a total of about 280,000 names. It should be noted that the lists of deportation to Theresienstadt refer to the "Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia", roughly the current Czech Republic, but there are included also deported from Germany; also all the deportees died documentarily certificates are already included in the books of the deaths of the fields or ghettos. In particular, most of the Jews deported from the abovementioned countries were sent to Auschwitz and died include the registers of deaths. For the eastern camps exist lists deportation of about 34,000 Dutch Jews registered in Sobibor (already included in the above-mentioned figure of 280,000). Putting together all the other lists of transport, you can get to 300,000, maybe 350,000 names, but still lacking 3300 .000 names: where are?

The question now clearly established the multiple repetitions of the same name (for example, by different documents and / or reports of several "witnesses" or simple duplication of the same document) can not explain this huge shortfall, so you have to ask at Yad Vashem: historical, pull out your documents, if they exist!

But the matter has the air of a colossal deception.

* * *

One thing even less known is that the "database" in question records even names of survivors!

Under carryover, as an example, the results of a brief survey conducted in "database" on the basis of the list of survivors established transport from Prague to the Lodz ghetto on October 16, 1941. Many of these survivors are registered as dead, some even twice! The source is: Terez ínská pemĕtní kniha. Terezínská Iniciativa. Melantrich, 1995, vol. I, p. 90 (there are the names of 24 survivors):

- Adlerová Doris, registered in the "database" as Aadler, Doris, 17.01.1929, released in Birnbämel

- Max Beck, registered as Bek Max, 02.06.1895, released to (not shown)

- Berg, Evžen, registered as Berg, Eugen, 01.06.1897, released in Friedland

- Daschová, Hana, recorded twice, as

1) Dasch, Chana, 12.20.1921,

2) Dasch Hanna, 20.12.1921,

released in Wittenberg

- Dub, Alfred, registered twice, as

1) Dub Alfred, 05/03/1923

2) Dub Alfred, 03.05.1923,

liberated Bergen-Belsen

- Ebenová Lotte, Lotte registered as Eben, 1921, released in Ravensbrück

- Eisnerová Irena, recorded twice, as

1) Eisner, Irene, 02.02.1910,

2) Eisner, Irene, 02.02.1910,

released in Ravenbrück

With a name phonetically similar, there are also two identical names:

1) Ajzner, Irene, 10.16.1910,

2) Ajzner, Irene, 10.16.1910,

- Flaumenhaft, Ervín, registered as Flaumenhaft, Erwin, 10.07.1904, released to Althammer

- Glaser, Leo, recorded twice, as

1) Leo Glazer, 07.07.1911,

2) Leo Glazer, 07.07.1911,

released to Königswusterhausen

- Egon Reiser, 01.01.1895, registered as Egon Reiser, 1895, released in Sachsenhausen (this is the Reiser Egon that appears in lists of deportation)

- Rosenfeld Moses, Moses recorded as Rosenfeld, 11.08.1911, transported to the Lodz 10.16.1941, released to Sonnenberg.

As another example, a very brief search, sample, in the "database" appear as the following Jewish death transferred July 19, 1944 from Riga to Stutthof and duly registered therein:

- Goldbaum Getrude, 05.03.1900, Czech, registered as Goldbaumova Getruda: n. list 684, n. freshman 48577; the "database" says: "H transport from Prague, Prague Hlavni Mesto, Bohemia, Czechoslovakia to Theresienstadt ghetto, Czechoslovakia on 30/11/1941". The "material" is "a list of the inmates of the camp Theresienstdt" and the status of the person is "murdered / perished."

In the aforementioned registry of Jews deported to Theresienstadt Czechs, Ms. Goldbaum is deported to Riga January 9, 1942 (p. 160) but not among the survivors.

- Todtenkopf Lina, 30/11/1901, Germany, registered with the same name: it 826, 48729 nm.

The "database" alleges the source "Gedenkbuch - Opfer der Verfolgung der Juden in Deutschland unter der nationalsozialistischen Gewaltherrschaft 1933-1945, Bundesarchiv (German National Archives), Koblenz 1986" [Book of Memory - Victims of the persecution of the Jews under the sovereignty violent Germany 1933-1945, Federal Archive, Koblenz (German National Archives), Koblenz. 1986]; his status is: missing. The type of material: "List of Jews in Germany killed."

Todtenkopf Lina, 11.30.1901, German, was a second time; the type of material is "List of deportation from Berlin", the source is another edition of Gedenkbuch (Gedenkbuch Berlins der Opfer des juedischen Nazionalsozialismus, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Zentralinstitut fuer Forschung Sozialwissenschaftliche, Edition Hentrich, Berlin 1995); the place of the alleged death is "Riga, Rigas, Vidzeme, Latvia."

- Weil Mariane, 14.02.1909 is registered as Marianne Weil; I 706, 48599 nm.

- Levitan Leiba, 02.25.1932, ndl 292, ndm 48195 results in "a list of Jews killed at the camp of Klooga, 1941-1944", but the massacre Klooga occurred September 19, 1944, after the prisoner had been transferred to Stutthof.

- Schick, Teresia, 08.12.1897, it 1921 nm 48924, figure in "a list of Austrian Jews killed", but its status is "murdered / perished."

That these Jews have died, or were even murdered, is not by any document.

Here is an essay small, but significant, the seriousness and the "scientific rigor" of that "database" and those who have compiled.

What would result from a systematic and thorough?

Carlo Mattogno

1 http://olodogma.com/wordpress/2013/04/2 ... e-via-web/ .

2 http://db.yadvashem.org/names/search.html?language=en.


If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
laapatti
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:33 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby laapatti » 3 years 8 months ago (Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:03 pm)

Otherwise Mattogno's text seems to be ok, but this statement is a bit strange:

"It is difficult to numerically evaluate these deaths names. We know with certainty, from a letter of Sonderstandesamt Arolsen of 11 May 1979, until 1978, the number of these deaths found in all German concentration camps was 217,304."

Surely Mattogno knows these are figures from a document which does not seem to even mention some camps, like Stutthof and Ravensbrueck. So it cannot be number for "all German concentration camps". Document itself is not very convincing either, at least not the one usually presented in the net:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... s_only.jpg

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2316
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby borjastick » 3 years 8 months ago (Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:10 pm)

A few comments off the cuff Hannover.

Firstly it always amazes me when we talk on this forum about 'The Numbers Game' it comes up over and over again. Not surprising really given the scale of the claimed six million dead. If the zionists weren't so hooked on engineering the second coming following the written about holocaust in their book of religion, they would have had a chance of convincing the world of their plight in the second world war. They remind me of an old boss of mine. We were a small company of about 22 staff with a turnover of about £14 million. Successful and well liked by our clients, but the boss couldn't help bigging it up, gilding the Lilly. He would always say 48 staff and £28m. God only knows why. Must have been something to do with his manhood. The point I'm making is that the jews could well have got away with 'death camps' and a million dead, but they just cannot stop themselves from lying.

The second point is one of personal history, I have mentioned this before but it is relevant here. My mother in law's sister married a jew from berlin. He and his family were reasonably well off and applied for the right to leave Germany in about 1938. They were allowed to leave and cleared off to England. He was about 8 at the time. They all lived in London thereafter until he left for Canada with his new bride in the late fifties. He once told me he had checked with the authorities about his family left in Berlin. What he found really shocked him, though he chuckled as he told me in the pub in about the year 2002. He found that he and his entire family were listed as dead holocaust victims, and I mean including all those who were with him and living in England! So you can be absolutely certain that lists of the missing are total crap and should never be relied on.

Lastly this is a point that came up recently with someone when discussing the holocaust and my feelings about it. My friend felt that those who went missing and relocated to Russia instead of being done in at camps like Treblinka would have come out of the woodwork once the iron curtain fell. Moreover they would have left families and history, and with the advent of the internet and freedoms in Russia in the last twenty years we would have hard factual records of large incoming hordes of jews in these areas.

On the face of it he has a point but the reality is that we are now three full generations after the fact. In the rural and poverty stricken regions of Russia things grind slow and movement is a rarity. They still live in backward times and I am sure many of those jews who were sent east died shortly thereafter or didn't live long and prosperous lives into the post war period.

As the article shows quite clearly above the figures don't get much past about 350,000 and that speaks volumes for the veracity of their holocaust claims.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Hannover » 3 years 8 months ago (Thu Mar 19, 2015 6:49 pm)

laapatti wrote:Otherwise Mattogno's text seems to be ok, but this statement is a bit strange:

"It is difficult to numerically evaluate these deaths names. We know with certainty, from a letter of Sonderstandesamt Arolsen of 11 May 1979, until 1978, the number of these deaths found in all German concentration camps was 217,304."

Surely Mattogno knows these are figures from a document which does not seem to even mention some camps, like Stutthof and Ravensbrueck. So it cannot be number for "all German concentration camps". Document itself is not very convincing either, at least not the one usually presented in the net: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e ... s_only.jpg

- Laapatti, you are assumimg that there were deaths at other camps that the International Red Cross did not report.

- Laapatti, please tell us which camps were not included, please give us the numbers of alleged deaths at those camps, tell us how any such numbers were derived, and please give us the supposed cause of deaths at those labor camps.

- Laapatti, are you saying that the International Red Cross document is a forgery or that the International Red Cross deliberately left out information?

Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
laapatti
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:33 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby laapatti » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:14 am)

Hannover wrote:- Laapatti, you are assumimg that there were deaths at other camps that the International Red Cross did not report.


I find it very unlikely nobody, not a single person died at Ravensbrueck or Stutthof during their time of operation.

Hannover wrote:- Laapatti, please tell us which camps were not included, please give us the numbers of alleged deaths at those camps, tell us how any such numbers were derived, and please give us the supposed cause of deaths at those labor camps.


I think I already said Ravensbrueck and Stutthof vere not included. I have no figures for Ravensbrueck, but Mattogno and Graf have in their work on Stutthof ended up to a figure 26000 deaths: "26,000 human beings who actually died in the camp".

http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/ccs/9.html

Their figures are based on death certificates, and other similar German documents. See here:

http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/ccs/4.html

Death certificates tell causes of deaths were for example heart failure. Unfortunately Mattogno and Graf do not tell more detailed about this.

Hannover wrote:- Laapatti, are you saying that the International Red Cross document is a forgery or that the International Red Cross deliberately left out information?


Or it was just a mistake. It obviously does not state figures for "all German concentration camps".

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Hannover » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 6:52 am)

Thanks to laapatti for his response.

If we add Stutthof (which has always been off the beaten path, so to speak) numbers, which the Red Cross obviously did not know much about or found unimportant, we continue to see how fraudulent Yad Vashem's bogus database truly is. And that is the point of the OP.

Laapatti can trivialize all he wants, it does nothing to support the lies of Yad Vashem.

Note that cases of compassionate mercy killings at Stutthof of the hopelessly incurable (a common worldwide practice, aka: euthanasia) are said to have been listed as "heart failure", Graf & Mattogno admit a total lack of documentation for such claims.

I'm also encouraged to see that laapatti does not believe in the impossible 'gas chambers & 6M'. :lol:

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Landulf
Member
Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 2:55 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Landulf » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 7:47 am)

Here is a document from Bad Arolsen that states number of deaths...
Attachments
arols2.jpg

avatar
laapatti
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:33 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby laapatti » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 8:18 am)

Landulf wrote:Here is a document from Bad Arolsen that states number of deaths...


That document looks much more convincing, and unlike the figure referred above presented by Mattogno, the figure 373,468 was also accepted by a representative of Red Cross during the Zuendel trial.

http://www.ihr.org/books/kulaszka/10biedermann.html

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Hannover » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:13 pm)

Thanks, Landulf.

I'm also happy that laapatti seems content.

Interesting to see the much smaller number for Stutthof vs. laapatti's post of Graf & Mattogno's undocumented & curious conjecture of 26,000.

I also see a work camp I never heard of, Vershiedene.

So Arolsen gives us a total of 373, 468, very close to Mattogno's 350K estimate. Another nail in the Yad Vashem database coffin.

The 'holocaust', falling apart faster than a cheap suit.

- Hannover

The 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
laapatti
Member
Member
Posts: 69
Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:33 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby laapatti » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:27 pm)

Hannover wrote:
I also see a work camp I never heard of, Vershiedene.


Probably because it is not a camp at all, "verschiedene" just means "various"... I guess it was for some subcamps or similar that author did not bother to list separately.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9581
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Hannover » 3 years 8 months ago (Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:48 pm)

laapatti wrote:
Hannover wrote:
I also see a work camp I never heard of, Vershiedene.


Probably because it is not a camp at all, "verschiedene" just means "various"... I guess it was for some subcamps or similar that author did not bother to list separately.

Ah. I was misled by their use of an upper case 'V', "Vershiedene".

Thanks, Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Werd » 3 years 8 months ago (Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:09 pm)

1002 - Reactions to post "The assembly of the dead olocau $ tical," Magda Goebbels "... in the database of the Yad Vashem?"
Olodogma
translated
March 22, 2015

The French media took note. Here is the article olodogma made note of. It is the French one.
http://www.alterinfo.net/Des-Italiens-e ... 12053.html

Here is translation via google to English.
Link. Here it is for posterity.
Italians and the imposture of Yad Vashem

The Italian revisionist website Olodogma in its thousandth online in March 19, 2015, article entitled "catena di montaggio dei morti olocaustici," Magda Goebbels "... nel database dello Yad Vashem?" (The assembly line holocaust dead, "Magda Goebbels" ... in the Yad Vashem database? "), Tells a pretty good shot he is the author.

Friday, March 20, 2015

The Italian newspaper "Corriere della Sera" in its issue of 11 November 2004, having invited people who have lost family or friends in "Holocaust" to report to the Yad Vashem memorial in Jerusalem the names of the disappeared " con la promessa verranno CHECKING e che nel inseriti database "(with the promise that these names will be checked and inserted into the database), the site manager Olodogma indulged in a joke (it was of no elsewhere the first time), with the intention of demonstrating that the Yad Vashem database was anything but reliable. He writes (rough translation):

http://olodogma.com/wordpress/2015/03/1 ... ad-vashem/

"Today we bring demonstration (once again) that the death toll of the Holocaust advanced by the Holocaust museum in Jerusalem, Yad Vashem, is not credible since ANYONE in few clicks can introduce a false name in the database name ... from 1 to infinity, it is only a matter of time and desire or necessity ... "

Olodogma and publish a website screenshot of the Yad Vashem showing gassed recording a false invented by the site, some Edith Frolla (but she will long be accessible?)

1) the name of Edith Frolla ... is an anagram of Adolf Hitler;

2) birth date, April 20, 1889, is ... that of Adolf Hitler;

3) the profession: painter ... like Hitler;

4) lived in Rome at 29 via della Lungara, which is ... the address of the Roman prison Regina Coeli;

5) the photo is provided to support the world-famous photo ... Magda Goebbels, wife of Goebbels!

This Frolla Edith is supposed to have been gassed in Majdanek using carbon monoxide.

And the site concluded: "NOBODY carried out any verification No check Not even about photography when we are told that Vatican Holocaust, Yad Vashem contains!" Evidence " the millions of victims of that Holocaust, we can quietly laugh, or send the address of the 1000th on-line. "

As for the anti-revisionist law was recently about to be passed, it seems to sleep in a drawer ministry in Rome ...

Bocage





Comments

1. Posted by the Depositary 20/03/2015 10:48 | Alert

Ah, the shot is not bad! When we say that this Holocaust story is fishy and hides many things. Here is one piece of evidence!

We say, to object, we do not judge a dramatic event like this on a simple mistake; Certainly! But just to be able to certify that the statement of such a person has been victim, the least thing is to check its authenticity. Or the photo being that of the wife of Goebbels, address, that of a prison, date of birth, as Hitler, etc. It's still a bit big and shows the lack of seriousness of this memorial. So, it would be very interesting and certainly very instructive to investigate the full names of this memorial. There could be many surprises ...

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Werd » 3 years 8 months ago (Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:17 pm)

From olodogma's article.



The news did some laps and counter inputs of the site has gone mad, and more! ... The post has been translated into French and relaunched by other sites. An avalanche of hits from francophone states (and beyond!).

Here is a brief gallery of screenshots ...

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image

Image


[1] The original of the press "Bocage".
[2] http://free.niooz.fr/des-italiens-et-l- ... 7771.shtml .
[3] http://www.interet-general.info/spip.php?article21212 .
[4] https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1093518/ (the democratic system of the ROD-Italy prevents access to the site Stormfront, but it is freely visible HERE .
[5] http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/eterne ... age25.html .
[5] http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/eternelle_2012/ .
[6] http://www.alterinfo.net/Des-Italiens-e ... 12053.html .
[7] Source http://www.osservatorioantisemitismo.it ... nline-2.pd f

________________________Pubblicato March 22, 2015, at 10.50

avatar
Werd
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 2:23 am

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Werd » 3 years 8 months ago (Mon Mar 23, 2015 7:28 pm)

1003 - More reactions to the post "dead olocau $ tical, Magda Goebbels' ... murderers memory 2nd edition?
Oldogma (translated)
March 23, 2015

"Assassins of Memory" 2nd edition?

On 03.19.2015 we had entered the post # 1,000 where he reported the news inclusion in the database of the museum $ dell'olocau to Yad Vashem in Jerusalem the fictitious name "Edith Shortbread". Were reported two other fictitious names entered in the same database. 03/22/2015 The day there is the fact that the new "Edith Shortbread" is NOT more present among the "dead" olocau $ tianizzati with inhalations of "carbon monoxide" in Konzentrationslager Lublin-Majdanek!

Image
Image
Image

The current situation of three consecutive tests, at 14.00 of 22:03:15, is as follows;

1) Edith Lang (THIS verification of 03/22/15, http://db.yadvashem.org/names/nameDetai ... anguage=en) [1]
2) Dova Cohen (THIS verification of 03/22/15, http://db.yadvashem.org/names/nameDetai ... anguage=en [2]
3) Edith Shortbread (No longer THIS verification of 03/15/22) [3]
Since the inclusion of post No. 1000, at 09.19 of 19:03:15, had, immediately, notice frantic "elected" presences, Olodogma on the site, from the main temple of 'olocau $ tianesimo ghetto self murocintato of Palestine, and more ... Here is some data appropriately, from us, amputees ...

19:03:15 10:54:53 COMMUNITY AND ...
19:03:15 14:14:12 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
19:03:15 14:19:30 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
20:03:15 11:32:48 Foundation documentation center and ...
20:03:15 15:33:38 * SE5-ptk * (Israel) 79.XXX ...
22:03:15 07:28:59 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
22:03:15 08:01:15 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
22:03:15 08:20:27 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
22:03:15 09:02:13 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
22:03:15 09:52:43 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
22:03:15 10:59:49 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX
22:03:15 14:31:57 M-net Telekommunikations GmbH (European Union) 194.246.16.XX
23:03:15 06:46:15 Nv-yad-vashem Jerusalem (Israel) 212.143.122.XX

The "case pastry-Spizzichino edith" is now solved, no trace is left!

The fumes virtual virtual card left the fireplace of the "museum"!

Image

... But they were not the nazzzisti who "attempted to remove evidence" of their misdeeds ...?

What lesson comes from the behavior of the museum $ dell'olocau to Jerusalem? Let us ask ourselves ... Let's see what we seem suddenly arisen:

1) Anyone who can assume the non-respect of the promises, the museum, the CHECK on the data arrived by mail or email?
2) Anyone can detect the fool from chocolatiers to the cancellation of bogus "Shortbread Edith" clue, incontrovertibly, the "lightness" (and we are benevolent) in information management? (Cancellation occurred after the publication in French of the "post-1000" and disseminated throughout Europe and French-speaking world)
3) Anyone can detect a funereal atmosphere of unreliability that "infect" unless inficierà, the aura of sacredness ol-institute?
4) Anyone can detect that was given to all a deadly weapon for the survival of the sacred mission of similar bandwagon olocau $ tico?
5) Anyone can be noted that the lightness (and we re-benevolent) the exercise of that bandwagon has offended irreversibly memory of real dead? (Here we exclude ALL the alleged gassed, of which there is not the slightest evidence of gassing ) of the time!
6) Anyone who can detect ANY reference, in discussions or actions at ALL levels in this bandwagon as a center of "Holocaust education" will be made ​​to counter the proponent?

Anyone, in fact, may request-reply:

what you say has been VERIFIED by that museum? ... Or it was like in the case of Edith Lang, Dova Cohen, Edith Shortbread?

... And "we must be silent" because the previous three are not a case! Looks very much like another!

Question: did we go wrong these six hypotheses?

Notes

[1] For a description of the "case-Lang" see here
[2] For a description of the "case-Cohen" see here
[3] For a description of the "case-Shortbread" see here
[4] Partial data, detected occasionally, so "at fault".

________________________ Posted March 23, 2015 at 21.52

User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1367
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Yad Vashem "Database" a proven fraud

Postby Dresden » 3 years 8 months ago (Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:42 pm)

"Edith Shortbread (No longer THIS verification of 03/15/22)"

So, "Edith Frolla"(Adolf Hitler) and Magda Goebbels are no longer on the Yad Vashem victims list; that's a shame!

Has anyone thought of submitting Blondi Schäferhund?
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests