As stated, TheBlackRabbitofinle posted a response to me which was littered with personal attacks, but hey, here's my response to his on topic points.
- We see that a 'gas chamber' is alleged without a shred of proof. Show us the gas chamber, Rabbit.
And...Hannover doesn't know that this trial did not concern itself with alleged gassings during Aktion T4, but only the lethal injections to non-German nationals. This was due to International Laws that the Allies had yet to circumvent, but I won't get into that.
So IOW, the film YOU posted, which you believe to be credible, which claims 'gas chambers' at Hadamar is BS. Ah!
- We hear about an alleged "detailed listing of all clinical data", but where is it, Rabbit?
So you do lie [see below] when you claim to have read Bolker's testimony, because he detailed much of it at the trial.
No, it appears that you are the 'untruthful' one ... inflammatory behavior from you as usual. Anyway, a la the nonsense at Nuremberg we have seen no actual 'detailed clinical data list' prepared at the supposed time of examination, only Bolker's claims. Hardly the same, Rabbit.
Imagine in a legit court of law saying to the court: 'We made a list at the time, but sorry there is no list to show the court, just believe me.' Laughable.
- We see a chubby guy with a pipe writing, what did he write? Anything? Why can't we see it, Rabbit?
You can't see it because the camera doesn't focus closely enough on it.
Why then isn't the supposedly all important writing published in original form? Well, because it doesn't exist and you cannot show it. Simple as that.
- We see no real autopsies whatsoever. Please show us real autopsies at Hadamar, Rabbit.
You're not qualified to judge what is and isn't a real autopsy.
Yes I am, actually read the links I sent you previously about real autopsies. Anyone who can read what's required for a real autopsy.
You want a list of defendants at the Hadamar trial too!
No, already know it. You want a list of the defendants at Nuremberg? Ah!
- We're told that bodies were "buried in piles of 20, 24 ... " So where are those piles to examine? Nowhere, it's all propaganda. Show us these "piles", Rabbit.
I don't have to substantiate claims that I didn't make. I posted the video to show to you that Bolker is featured performing his work than in more than your *staged hoax photo*.
Yet rabbit posted an Allied propaganda film which claims that corpses were "buried in piles of 20, 24 ... ", he cites the film as credible, but now he rejects the contents in the film. Crazy stuff to be sure. As for 'Bolker performing his work', bingo! Performing
is spot on. The entire phony autopsies are laughable. I mean, alleged autopsies performed on the dirt? Now that's the stuff of 'holocaust' propaganda. And indeed, the photo is staged, ahem ...'performed'.
- We're hilariously told that the Hadamar judge said that 'when the 10,000th person died the Nazis held a celebration'. That's the Hadamar judge who could allege anything with impunity. There is no proof whatsoever for the bogus 10,000. Show us the graves of 10,000, Rabbit.
No surprise to see you think that all were supposedly buried, and are not aware that they are claimed to have been mostly cremated.
"Mostly"? So where are the others?
Cremated? So what? Apparently Rabbit is not aware that cremation leaves a lot of human remains, which he nor anyone else can produce. Ah! I welcome Rabbit to 'holocau$t' Revisionism 101 which has established that fact rather clearly.
- We do see a total of five corpses placed on the ground, not a real autopsy in a real medical environment, the cause of death of these five is not shown. Your best shot Rabbit?
Rabbit desperate for something, anything says:
You can't even count now; there are six corpses.
Wow six corpses out of an alleged 10,000
. I suggest to Rabbit that when he's in a hole, stop digging.
The propaganda film is so bad that one has to wonder if The Rabbit ever watched it. He must be a glutton for punishment as he obviously has stepped on a landmine.
Your review of it is certainly terrible. But that's mainly due to the fact you don't know anything about Hadamar because of your renown reluctance to read books to learn about a topic before posting your opinions online.
It's not meant as a "review", but a takedown of the debunked nonsense contained in what RABBIT posted. See above. After much reading I apparently know more about Hadamar than Rabbit and do not accept the propaganda marketed about it, but Rabbit faithfully believes in what he cannot prove. Curious.
It also escaped your attention that the photo you lifted was taken at night, or at least at dusk. Whereas the photo from the Hadamar trial book shows Bolker at work on the corpses in daylight. Why would he have spent so long by the corpses if he was only there for a "staged" photo op?
Photo at "night/dusk". So what? The body is clearly laying on the ground and clearly no real autopsy is being performed. He stood next to corpses for "so long"? So what? You're making no sense. Standing next to a few corpses is not an autopsy. You're embarrassingly grasping at straws here.
Rabbit now says:
No surprise Hannover's feigning not to understand a question he can't answer.
Indeed, a very confused question from Rabbit to begin with.
Here it is again:
Why would Dr. Bolker have spend so long with the corpses if he was merely there for a quick scene in a hoax film and staged photo op?
And why did they bother using a real pathologist in this film at all, why not use an actor, or a squaddie in a white coat, if it was all just an elaborate hoax?
Is Dr. Bolker also a propaganda hoax?
Who said anything about "quick"? You did, not me. The staged photo is just one of many.
Rabbit attempts to deflect by raising the use of "a real pathologist"?
Anyway, it's simple. It's an attempt to make everything appear on the up & up. It's what is claimed about Hadamar that is the issue, not about "a real pathologist". Like at Nuremberg, people said what they were essentially instructed to say. Want to discuss Nuremberg, Rabbit? No doubt you find those Show Trials believable like the Hadamar Show Trial, which was a precursor to Nuremberg.
Are you claiming it's impossible to perform an autopsy outside of an autopsy room?
Is it also impossible for surgeons to perform operations outside an operating theatre?
It's impossible to perform autopsies on the dirt without proper medical tables, tools, equipment, & staff. Yes indeed.
Of course autopsies can be performed anywhere, IF one has the necessary medical tables, tools, equipment, & staff.
A worthless opinion from someone who doesn't know what he's talking about.
IOW, he has no answer to my rebuttal, very funny.
Rabbit falsely states:
So you didn't bother reading his testimony I linked either! Bolker actually confirmed that no trace of the substances used to kill the sick prisoners was discovered due to the length of time of the corpses had been buried
In fact I did read it. Yes I saw "that no trace of the substances used to kill the sick prisoners was discovered due to the length of time of the corpses had been buried". Even without autopsies, which were obviously not done, Bolker or anyone else, could easily state "no trace of the substances used to kill the sick prisoners was discovered due the length of time of the corpses had been buried", it is no great feat to make such an assumption. A no brainer and a easy way to bluff a claim of autopsies.
Rabbit deflects again:
No you didn't read it, otherwise you would have pounced upon the extract I quoted to prove that the autopsies found no proof of poisoning.
You're now stuck with this convoluted conspiracy claim about the autopsies being a staged hoax and propaganda which didn't find proof of poisoning.
No, it is Rabbit who is stuck trying to defend the absurd Hadamar 'gas chambers, the laughable '10,000', the utter lack of verifiable autopsies, the complete lack of mass graves for the 10,000 supposedly cremated, and well, those not cremated.
As usual, taking down Believers in things they can produce no proof for is a piece of cake.
- HannoverThe 'holocaust' storyline is one of the most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. What sort of truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth? Truth needs no protection from scrutiny.
The tide is turning.