it is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.”
- French 'historian' Jacques Baynac, Le Nouveau Quotidien (Lausanne, Switzerland), Sept. 3, 1996, p. 14.
At the Nuremberg Show Trials the existence of gas chambers was just assumed without a forensic study* and could not be questioned, aka: 'judicial notice'.
In fact, The Charter of the International Military Tribunal permitted the use of normally inadmissible "evidence."
Article 19 specified that:
The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence... and shall admit any evidence which it deems to have probative value."
* Another fact, there was a detailed study presented at Nuremberg by the communist Soviets which 'proved' the existence of steam chambers that were used to lobster Jews. It was accepted by the Allied powers without being questioned.
And of course this howler:
It is not necessary to ask how, technically, such a mass murder was possible. It was possible technically since it took place. That is the necessary point of departure for any historical inquiry on this subject. It is our function simply to recall that truth: there is not, there cannot be, any debate about the existence of the gas chambers".
- Pierre Vidal-Naquet with Léon Poliakov, published in Le Monde on 21 February 1979, page 23, signed by 34 'historians'
Also, there were not and still haven't been any excavations with contents verified and shown of the '6M Jews & 5M others' that are said to be buried in allegedly known enormous mass graves.
Yep, that's how they roll.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the laughable 'holocaust' storyline is the message.