upcoming Holocaust Handbooks

[Hektor]

I can sign Werd's posting. Mattogno proved his accuracy and dedication in this monograph. Nyszli also claimed to be a witness in the I.G. Farben trial (I think) but Carlo never found any documentary proof that he was called in to testify.

Nyiszli obviously had no idea of the Zyklon products. He talks about Zyklon A being used, which wasn't on the market for 2 decades, and claims that Zyklon B had purple crystals. His testimony is also wrong on the color of the gassed victims. This is a special issue for me because Nyiszli studied and graduated in medicine, so we should expect from him an accurate observation on this matter.

As said before, this work does a good job examining Nyiszli.

It's like with the "blue haze" Richard Boeck.

They miscolor materials or people. But I think that when you're a real liar, you'll dislearn the ability to distinguish between fact and fiction after a while. So you start making false statements even on issues you should know better about.

Right now, I'm watching Lanzmann's Shoah again. There are quite some figures that had been filmed that you can notice are lying. Other characters are more or less honest, but appear to be deceived.

[Revisionist]

I wonder if Jurgen Graf's monograph about eyewitnesses will be finished by him. The release date is still declared with 11/2017. He seems to have dropped out of revisionism since he doesn't even translate anything anymore. I could imagine that Germar takes over and completes it. Still I liked Graf's writing style.

Hektor: https://bombardsbodylanguage.com/
Watch some videos of her and you can self-teach in reading body language.

[Revisionist]

Carlo Mattogno: The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories—Genesis, Responsibilities and Activities.
(translation progress as of March 1, 2018: 700 pages of 780 pp. total)

[Werd]

At the back of the Mengele/Nyiszli book, it says Graf's book is due out at the end of 2018, around the same time we should expect the Einsatzgruppen book.

The Einsatzgruppen book is now 730 pages translated out of 780. Much like the Nyiszli book, it will have to be checked by Rudolf and then sent back to the translator again one more time before it can be printed. Since it's a large book, it will take a long time. Which is why we should see it by the end of this year.

[Hektor]

.....
The Einsatzgruppen book is now 730 pages translated out of 780. Much like the Nyiszli book, it will have to be checked by Rudolf and then sent back to the translator again one more time before it can be printed. Since it's a large book, it will take a long time. Which is why we should see it by the end of this year.

I'm looking forward to it. It covers a part of the narrative that has grown in importance over the last two decades.

The type of complementary book (to the series), I'd be looking for would be dealing with Psychological Warfare, propaganda and Reeducation. But that's a different ball game I think for many. It deals more with psychology, sociology, military strategy and political science.

I believe there is a book with the title sykewar, but it's not detailed on atrocity propaganda. However the following can help to demonstrate where this all was coming from: https://archive.org/details/KurtLewinRe ... nOfGermans

[Werd]

Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 39:
Carlo Mattogno: The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories—Genesis, Responsibilities and Activities.
translation finished, first review process by translator himself

[Werd]

Carlo Mattogno: The Einsatzgruppen in the Occupied Eastern Territories—Genesis, Responsibilities and Activities.
(editing, page 114 of 780)

[Werd]

This is one of the books that is due soon in English.


Jürgen Graf: Auschwitz: Confessions and Testimonies—A Critical Analysis.


Well it is now available from the codoh shop IN GERMAN.


https://shop.codoh.com/book/480/494

Auschwitz: Augenzeugenberichte und Tätergeständnisse des Holocaust
30 Gaskammer-Zeugen kritisch geprüft
By Jürgen Graf
Das von der breiten Öffentlichkeit wahrgenommene Geschichtsbild des berüchtigten Lagers Auschwitz beruht fast ausschließlich auf dem, was Zeugen diesseits und jenseits des Lagerzauns darüber berichtet haben. Büchereien und Videokanäle wie YouTube sind reichlich ausgestattet mit Erlebnisberichten. Doch wie zuverlässig sind diese Berichte?

Eine der wichtigsten Pflichten des Historikers ist die Quellenkritik, also die kritische Analyse der Beweise, auf denen unser Geschichtsbild beruht. Für Lager wie Auschwitz bedeutet dies festzustellen, inwieweit Zeugenberichte zuverlässig sind, wo die Zeugen geirrt haben oder es nicht so genau mit der Wahrheit hielten.

Eine solche Quellenkritik prüft Aussagen dahingehend, ob sie in sich selbst widerspruchsfrei sind, sich mit anderen Aussagen decken, von Dokumenten aus der Kriegszeit bestätigt werden und materiellen Gegebenheiten nicht zuwiderlaufen.

Die vorliegende Studie wendet diese Technik auf 30 der bekanntesten bzw. wichtigsten Zeugen an, die sich zu Auschwitz geäußert haben, so unter anderem die vormaligen Häftlinge Elie Wiesel, Rudolf Vrba, Filip Müller, Charles S. Bendel, Miklós Nyiszli und Olga Lengyel, sowie die vormaligen Angehörigen des SS-Lagerpersonals Rudolf Höß, Pery Broad, Johann Paul Kremer, Hans Aumeier, Maximilian Grabner und Richard Böck. Graf gibt die für seine Analyse ausschlaggebenden Passagen der einschlägigen Aussagen wieder, die sich auf die Massenvernichtung in Auschwitz beziehen, und unterzieht sie einer fachgerechten kritischen Analyse.

Kein anderer Autor hat je diese undankbare Herausforderung angenommen, da die Kritik an Holocaust-Zeugen als Sakrileg eingestuft wird. Insofern ist dies eine wichtige, bahnbrechende Studie, der viele weitere folgen mögen.

google translate:

Auschwitz: Eyewitness accounts and allegations of the Holocaust
30 gas chamber witnesses tested critically

The history of the notorious Auschwitz camp, perceived by the general public, rests almost exclusively on what witnesses on both sides of the camp fence have reported on it. Libraries and video channels like YouTube are richly equipped with experience reports. But how reliable are these reports?

One of the most important duties of the historian is the critique of sources, that is, the critical analysis of the evidence on which our historical picture is based. For camps like Auschwitz, this means determining to what extent witness accounts are reliable, where the witnesses were wrong or did not keep it so accurate with the truth.

Such source criticism examines statements as to whether they are consistent in themselves, coincide with other statements, are confirmed by wartime documents and do not run counter to material circumstances.

The present study applies this technique to 30 of the best-known and most important witnesses to Auschwitz, including the former inmates Elie Wiesel, Rudolf Vrba, Filip Müller, Charles S. Bendel, Miklós Nyiszli and Olga Lengyel, and others the former members of the SS camp staff Rudolf Höss, Pery Broad, Johann Paul Kremer, Hans Aumeier, Maximilian Grabner and Richard Böck. Graf reproduces the relevant passages of the relevant statements relating to the mass extermination in Auschwitz and subjects them to a professional critical analysis.

No other author has ever accepted this thankless challenge, as criticism of Holocaust witnesses is considered sacrilege. So this is an important, groundbreaking study that may be followed by many more.

[TimeTraveler]

This is one of the books that is due soon in English.


Jürgen Graf: Auschwitz: Confessions and Testimonies—A Critical Analysis.


Well it is now available from the codoh shop IN GERMAN.


https://shop.codoh.com/book/480/494

Auschwitz: Augenzeugenberichte und Tätergeständnisse des Holocaust
30 Gaskammer-Zeugen kritisch geprüft
By Jürgen Graf
Das von der breiten Öffentlichkeit wahrgenommene Geschichtsbild des berüchtigten Lagers Auschwitz beruht fast ausschließlich auf dem, was Zeugen diesseits und jenseits des Lagerzauns darüber berichtet haben. Büchereien und Videokanäle wie YouTube sind reichlich ausgestattet mit Erlebnisberichten. Doch wie zuverlässig sind diese Berichte?

Eine der wichtigsten Pflichten des Historikers ist die Quellenkritik, also die kritische Analyse der Beweise, auf denen unser Geschichtsbild beruht. Für Lager wie Auschwitz bedeutet dies festzustellen, inwieweit Zeugenberichte zuverlässig sind, wo die Zeugen geirrt haben oder es nicht so genau mit der Wahrheit hielten.

Eine solche Quellenkritik prüft Aussagen dahingehend, ob sie in sich selbst widerspruchsfrei sind, sich mit anderen Aussagen decken, von Dokumenten aus der Kriegszeit bestätigt werden und materiellen Gegebenheiten nicht zuwiderlaufen.

Die vorliegende Studie wendet diese Technik auf 30 der bekanntesten bzw. wichtigsten Zeugen an, die sich zu Auschwitz geäußert haben, so unter anderem die vormaligen Häftlinge Elie Wiesel, Rudolf Vrba, Filip Müller, Charles S. Bendel, Miklós Nyiszli und Olga Lengyel, sowie die vormaligen Angehörigen des SS-Lagerpersonals Rudolf Höß, Pery Broad, Johann Paul Kremer, Hans Aumeier, Maximilian Grabner und Richard Böck. Graf gibt die für seine Analyse ausschlaggebenden Passagen der einschlägigen Aussagen wieder, die sich auf die Massenvernichtung in Auschwitz beziehen, und unterzieht sie einer fachgerechten kritischen Analyse.

Kein anderer Autor hat je diese undankbare Herausforderung angenommen, da die Kritik an Holocaust-Zeugen als Sakrileg eingestuft wird. Insofern ist dies eine wichtige, bahnbrechende Studie, der viele weitere folgen mögen.

google translate:

Auschwitz: Eyewitness accounts and allegations of the Holocaust
30 gas chamber witnesses tested critically

The history of the notorious Auschwitz camp, perceived by the general public, rests almost exclusively on what witnesses on both sides of the camp fence have reported on it. Libraries and video channels like YouTube are richly equipped with experience reports. But how reliable are these reports?

One of the most important duties of the historian is the critique of sources, that is, the critical analysis of the evidence on which our historical picture is based. For camps like Auschwitz, this means determining to what extent witness accounts are reliable, where the witnesses were wrong or did not keep it so accurate with the truth.

Such source criticism examines statements as to whether they are consistent in themselves, coincide with other statements, are confirmed by wartime documents and do not run counter to material circumstances.

The present study applies this technique to 30 of the best-known and most important witnesses to Auschwitz, including the former inmates Elie Wiesel, Rudolf Vrba, Filip Müller, Charles S. Bendel, Miklós Nyiszli and Olga Lengyel, and others the former members of the SS camp staff Rudolf Höss, Pery Broad, Johann Paul Kremer, Hans Aumeier, Maximilian Grabner and Richard Böck. Graf reproduces the relevant passages of the relevant statements relating to the mass extermination in Auschwitz and subjects them to a professional critical analysis.

No other author has ever accepted this thankless challenge, as criticism of Holocaust witnesses is considered sacrilege. So this is an important, groundbreaking study that may be followed by many more.

I've been really excited for this one. The handbooks really needed a edition dedicated just on witnesses. Because it's one of the main reasons why people believe in this fairy tale.

[Pia Kahn]

Yes, I read an older version of this book in German. It was already really good. I have read that this English version is going to be much improved over the original German edition.

[Pia Kahn]

Having read about 150 pages of the new edition of the German book by Graf, I am sure that this book is going to be a classic in revisionist literature and will have a huge impact. There are essentially two reasons:

1. Graf writes in a lucid style.

Unfortunately, Mattogno's books are hard to digest. This limits their impact. Jurgen Graf has the talent to present complex arguments in a very accessible manner.

2. The clear structure of the book.

The first part explains the value of testimony and how testimony must be analyzed. The second part presents the context of the testimony, i.e. the proven facts about Auschwitz. Finally, the testimony is analyzed in this context.

3. The testimony is brilliantly torn apart.

Anyone who reads Graf's book with an open mind will have an extremely hard time to defend the credibility of these witnesses.

The book has been expanded quite significantly. In particular, technical details, such as the infamous Kula columns are now discussed in detail. Once in a while, a slight polemical tone can be found in the discussion of the testimony, like the fantasies of baron Munchhausen. Otherwise, I can find no fault in Graf's book.

This should be one of the first books that beginners in revisionism should read. It is highly recommended.

[borjastick]

Can these books be bought direct from Castle Hill or another distributor and is there a web site does anyone know?

[JLAD Prove Me Wrong]

Can these books be bought direct from Castle Hill or another distributor and is there a web site does anyone know?

These books can be found at:

http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

https://shop.codoh.com/

https://www.findbookprices.com/

https://www.bookfinder.com/

https://www.thebookseller.biz/

https://www.betterworldbooks.com

http://www.booksamillion.com

Have fun.

[DissentingOpinions]

Found this little nugget while going through the series on Barnes & Noble.


Germar Rudolf: Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers: An Introduction and Update to Jean-Claude Pressac's Magnum Opus

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/auschwitz-germar-rudolf/1129223783?ean=9781591482031

[Werd]

It looks like it will be available January 1, 2019. Here is a summary about it.

Until the late 1980s, most of what the world knew about the infamous Auschwitz Camp came from witness testimony. But witnesses can be wrong for multiple intentional and accidental reasons. So how can we reach solid ground about the history of Auschwitz, if we cannot rely on witnesses?

In the 1980s, French hobby historian Jean-Claude Pressac addressed this challenge by trying to prove only with documents that the many testimonies about mass-extermination events at the Auschwitz Camp are essentially true. In 1989, he published a 564-page book in oversize landscape format featuring reproductions of hundreds of original German wartime documents on Auschwitz that were thoroughly annotated by Pressac. With this trail-blazing book titled Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, Auschwitz research, for the first time, obtained a solid foundation supported by documents.

Of course, research has not stood still since then. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, a lot of previously classified archival material was made accessible. This material was subsequently analyzed by a number of independent researchers. The main text of the present book gives an overview of these research results while frequently referring to Pressac's 1989 book, which, although no longer in print, can be viewed free of charge online. Unfortunately, however, the low-resolution images of Pressac's many documents posted online are rather unsatisfactory. Hence, a reprint of Pressac's magnum opus was desirable, but because it has become partly obsolete due to more recent research, it would be irresponsible to offer Pressac's statements from 1989 as the final word on topic. This booklet therefore aims at bringing owners of an original copy, readers of a library copy or the online version of Pressac's book, or anyone else, up to speed with the current knowledge on document research into Auschwitz. The text of this book is also included in the reprint.

https://www.booktopia.com.au/auschwitz- ... 82031.html