Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Callahan
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:40 am

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Callahan » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:41 pm)

Dresden wrote:Richard Gage's Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth( https://www.ae911truth.org/ ) has the signatures of over 3,000 Architects and Engineers(many of whom own their own companies) who have given their names, addresses, phone numbers and places of business, calling for a "new" investigation of 9-11.

I have my own quibbles with AE911T but that discussion is best saved for the proper forum, once it becomes available. I think they are correct that fire should not have caused the collapse but I disagree with the notion of "controlled demolition" at the WTC.

I don't want to discuss/debate it here, just pointing out that there is a spectrum of ideas on what happened and having the ability to showcase our ideas and have them challenged and refined by other informed, critical minds who may already be on the same page about Revisionism seems like a great opportunity.

9-11 Truthers are already Politically Incorrect truth seekers ..... many of them would see the truth of Holocaust Revisionism.

Exactly. There is less fear to walk into the "realm of Revisionism" when society already sees you as being halfway there. For those recognizing Zionist influences regarding 9/11, even moreso.

User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:05 pm)

Callahan wrote:I have my own quibbles with AE911T but that discussion is best saved for the proper forum, once it becomes available. I think they are correct that fire should not have caused the collapse but I disagree with the notion of "controlled demolition" at the WTC.


Exactly, we need a separate sub-forum to hash out our differences, and this is the perfect place to do it.

Moderator, it is Christmas Eve. Can you please give us this sub-forum as a gift to us on this website?

Merry Christmas to all, and to all a goodnight, JLAD.
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Moderator » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:18 am)

All of the comments are certainly appreciated, there are many thoughtful points to both sides of the argument.

After considering them all, and after feedback from the CODOH Board, I have decided to go ahead with the '9/11 Forum'.

The fact that so many people worldwide now disagree with the 'official' conspiracy theory was key in that decision. It is no longer a 'fringe' opinion to question the promoted narrative, in spite of 'the media's' attempt to claim it is.

To those that disagree with my decision, I will not indicate in the '9/11 Forum' description and guidelines that CODOH as a whole endorses or opposes the alternative views to the government's narrative.

The intention is to provide a higher end debate choice where reasonable guidelines are in place to prevent the usual childishness that is the norm when discussing a controversial subject.

Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Dresden » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Tue Dec 25, 2018 11:51 am)

Thank you for the decision, Moderator!

Moderator said:

"The intention is to provide a higher end debate choice where reasonable guidelines are in place to prevent the usual childishness that is the norm when discussing a controversial subject"

That's the idea.
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith

Pia Kahn
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 363
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:57 am

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Pia Kahn » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Wed Dec 26, 2018 7:18 am)

Moderator wrote:All of the comments are certainly appreciated, there are many thoughtful points to both sides of the argument.

After considering them all, and after feedback from the CODOH Board, I have decided to go ahead with the '9/11 Forum'. ...

Thanks, M1


Great news and smart decision. If this forum provides an orderly and rational discussion of 9/11 then it may attract many 9/11 truthers who wish to discuss controversial topics in a polite, respectful and rational manner without flame wars, ad hominem attacks, and all that.

Currently, this forum has three main headings: "Holocaust revisionism (English)", "Holocaust revisionism (International)" and Finally, "Revisionism". I suggest adding the subforum "9/11-revisionism" under the "Revisionism" header and side by side with WWI and WWII revisionism. This would fit nicely into this forum.

Happy Christmas everybody. :cheers:
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.

katana
Member
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 8:04 am
Contact:

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby katana » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Fri Dec 28, 2018 3:31 am)

Thank you Moderator for deciding to go ahead with a 9/11 Forum. A decision that reflects your wisdom, and no doubt your good looks, charming nature, and wonderful singing ability!

And thanks to Callahan for kicking the whole thing off, and also others here who also supported the idea. The others who were not keen on the idea also played a useful role in giving their feedback.

And a happy New Year to all, while I'm here.

PS: Here's a graphic for the forum;

Image
"Some stories are true that never happened." — Elie the "Weasel"

User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:55 am)

Moderator, I am very happy you chose to go along with this this addition.

If I may ask, when should we expect to see it in it's completed status?
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Moderator » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:57 pm)

Soon, JLAD,

How about some suggestions about guidelines for the new forum from everyone.
Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.

User avatar
Callahan
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 210
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 9:40 am

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Callahan » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:29 pm)

As mentioned briefly before, I suggest pinned posts for presentation and criticism of evidence of the following theories on WTC collapse mechanisms:

- NIST Fire-Driven Collapse Theory
- AE911Truth Controlled Demolition Theory
- Mini-Nuke Theory
- Direct Energy Weapon (DEW) Theory
- ROOSD Theory

I think a separate area for each of the major competing theories will help prevent the hodgepodge of heated, disorganized debate that discussions on 9/11 are most famous for.

If you're not yet familiar with ROOSD theory, not to worry, I will help get us started there. Others who recognize another theory as most sound should perhaps introduce the topic by explaining which evidence they find most convincing.

Other pinned posts may include:

- Motive: Pretext for Zionist Imperialist Wars
- Motive: Jihadi Terror Assault on Western Values
- Means: Positions of Authority Surrounding 9/11 Events
- Means: Terrorist Cell with Hijacked Planes
Last edited by Callahan on Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:31 pm)

Moderator wrote:How about some suggestions about guidelines for the new forum from everyone.


The guidelines would be as follows; changes were made when necessary. Are these good, or would you change anything?

The Moderator retains the right to reject a username if he considers it offensive, obscene, or deliberately distracting.

Do not register under more than one username, aka: a 'sockpuppet'. If for some reason you wish to change your username please contact the Moderator and / or Webmaster about doing so.

No name calling, period.

The CODOH 9/11 Forum forbids any threats or personal attacks against others, we will not tolerate links to sites which do engage in such behavior. We're about debate and only debate.

On topic posts only. The topic of the Forum is 9/11. Debating whether or not the United States government or others had preknowledge of the event, if there was or was not controlled demolition, and if 9/11 is or is not used to justify the TSA, NSA, surveillance cameras, internet surveilance, military occupation in Middle Eastern nations, is the reason that The CODOH 9/11 Forum exists. Associated subjects are bound to come up, be sure there is a tie-in, show the tie-in. Each topic represents a separate point, a post to a topic must be pertinent to that point.

Posts by new or infrequent participants will be spam / troll checked by the Moderator before they appear on the Forum. They will not be censored for on topic opinions they present.

Keep your threads / posts limited to one point.

Voluminous, lengthy, and redundant posts are not welcomed.

Do not edit after posts after someone has responded in the same thread.

If you post a quote or link from or to a book, a news article, magazine story, another website, etc., you must also comment on the quote or the link content. Tell the forum what you find wrong, compelling, unique, or important about the quote or link content. Flippant, overly brief comments are not acceptable. We want commentary and discussion.

Posts which lack focus or specifics are not welcomed.

No 'dodging'. When questioned or challenged on claims, or assertions you make in a thread you must respond directly / specifically by providing the information requested in the challenge or you must leave the topic.

You will address registrants only by the one name that he/she uses at the Forum.

Offenders will have their posts deleted, repeat offenders will be removed.

Reasons for deletions may or may not be stated. The Moderator will endeavor to notify the offender and the Forum in general, but not in every case; especially when it is obvious why the post was deleted.

Registrants who do not post within 30 days from date of registration are subject to deletion, they may re-register should they decide to post.
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2497
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby borjastick » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Dec 30, 2018 7:17 am)

OK then the decision has been made so can we block this thread now please as it's lowering the tone of holocaust debate.

When the new thread starts I'll be waiting for the loons to come out to play, posting all manner of nonsense to claim this and that and completely ignoring the rational and scientific answers to what really happened on that day.
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Depth Charge
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:32 pm

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Depth Charge » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Dec 30, 2018 7:21 am)

borjastick wrote:OK then the decision has been made so can we block this thread now please as it's lowering the tone of holocaust debate.

When the new thread starts I'll be waiting for the loons to come out to play, posting all manner of nonsense to claim this and that and completely ignoring the rational and scientific answers to what really happened on that day.


On the contrary, I think disinformation will be easily dismantled by the regulars on this site, and establish us as discerning and sane.

User avatar
borjastick
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 2497
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 5:52 am
Location: Europe

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby borjastick » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Dec 30, 2018 8:14 am)

Depth Charge wrote:
borjastick wrote:OK then the decision has been made so can we block this thread now please as it's lowering the tone of holocaust debate.

When the new thread starts I'll be waiting for the loons to come out to play, posting all manner of nonsense to claim this and that and completely ignoring the rational and scientific answers to what really happened on that day.


On the contrary, I think disinformation will be easily dismantled by the regulars on this site, and establish us as discerning and sane.


Good luck with that one...
'Of the four million Jews under Nazi control in WW2, six million died and alas only five million survived.'

'We don't need evidence, we have survivors' - israeli politician

Depth Charge
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:32 pm

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Depth Charge » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Dec 30, 2018 11:19 am)

borjastick wrote:
Depth Charge wrote:
borjastick wrote:OK then the decision has been made so can we block this thread now please as it's lowering the tone of holocaust debate.

When the new thread starts I'll be waiting for the loons to come out to play, posting all manner of nonsense to claim this and that and completely ignoring the rational and scientific answers to what really happened on that day.


On the contrary, I think disinformation will be easily dismantled by the regulars on this site, and establish us as discerning and sane.


Good luck with that one...


Why do we need luck? There is only one truth. It's like hacking ice off a windscreen. Easy.

User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1650
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 9:23 am

Re: Should The CODOH Revisionist Forum have a separate 9/11 discussion - debate forum?

Postby Moderator » 9 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Dec 30, 2018 2:57 pm)

All:

The new '9/11 Forum' will be built within a few days after 1/1/19.
When it's launched I will lock this thread and immediately ask for feedback in a thread at that forum.

And remember, if it becomes unmanageable, I can always "pull it". :roll:

Thanks, M1
Only lies need to be shielded from debate, truth welcomes it.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Pia Kahn and 4 guests