The Pentagon, where is the wreckage of the alleged airliner?

Moderator: Moderator

avatar
Depth Charge
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 199
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:32 pm

Re: The Pentagon, where is the wreckage of the alleged airliner?

Postby Depth Charge » 1 week 3 days ago (Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:27 am)

Hannover wrote:- "Moving parts"? As in your remote controlled airliner with no wreckage & human remains moving parts? :lol:


What's funny? "Moving parts", per your insinuation - that the airliner was taken somewhere else and destroyed in secret, making the more complex. The victims were also taken somewhere else and murdered in secret. Their remains were destroyed in secret. Meanwhile, also per your insinuation (insinuation only because you're offering no retort, but smileys), a missile or bomb was planted, liars were recruited to regale us of tales of the plane hitting and then engineers were also brought in to cut down lamp posts. Parts of a similar plane, of a similar color were also driven to the scene and planted. Pictures from a different wreckage, but similar, according to you, were also presented to the public.

- And we are not discussing Shankesville in this thread.


Says who? It is pertinent.

No wreckage, no human remains, no Pentagon airliner.


WTC 1/2 - No wreckage, no human remains, no WTC airliner. And? Your point is? Are you also going to tell us 'no planes' hit those buildings? Do you understand what happens when a plane hits a building at that speed?



User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: The Pentagon, where is the wreckage of the alleged airliner?

Postby Dresden » 1 week 2 days ago (Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:29 pm)

Depth Charge:

It is virtually impossible that Jamie McIntyre, "...CNN's military affairs correspondent", missed the evidence of a plane having crashed "...anywhere near the Pentagon", in his "...close-up inspection", when he "...walked right up next to the building".



You can post a bunch of blurry pictures, but you can never get over the fact that there was no evidence of a commercial airliner or anything else at the Pentagon.

"I do feel you have a tendency, Hannover, to be defensive though"

That sure seems like PROJECTION, to me.
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith

User avatar
Dresden
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:38 pm

Re: The Pentagon, where is the wreckage of the alleged airliner?

Postby Dresden » 1 week 2 days ago (Thu Jan 10, 2019 2:34 pm)

Craig McKee used to have the website, Truth and Shadows, that dealt with 9-11 in general and the Pentagon in particular.

His website was taken down by the enemies of truth, the Thought Police; he is now in the process of getting his website back up.

Here it is:

http://truthandshadows.com/2019/01/09/t ... kOmntPMqKg

Here is an article by Craig McKee about the Doctored Pentagon video:

https://web.archive.org/web/20170719150 ... nside-job/

Craig also writes articles for AE911Truth.

Maybe we'll hear from Craig, here on this Forum..... hint, hint. :D
Maybe, just maybe, they believe what they are telling you about the 'holocaust', but maybe, just maybe, their contempt for your intelligence and your character is beyond anything you could ever have imagined. -- Bradley Smith

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9622
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Re: The Pentagon, where is the wreckage of the alleged airliner?

Postby Hannover » 1 week 2 days ago (Thu Jan 10, 2019 4:09 pm)

Depth Charge says:
WTC 1/2 - No wreckage, no human remains, no WTC airliner. And? Your point is? Are you also going to tell us 'no planes' hit those buildings? Do you understand what happens when a plane hits a building at that speed?

- My point is that wreckage and human remains would be available to see if an airliner hit the Pentagon, as I said before.

- Yes, when an airliner allegedly hits a building we would necessarily have massive wreckage and human remains, as I said before.
BTW: How fast can a big commercial airliner actually go at just a few feet in elevation?

- I note that you ignored the claim that 125 people, not in the airplane, but supposedly IN the Pentagon, who could not have been made into your airplane "confetti" were allegedly killed, so where are those remains?
How fast were THEY traveling? Sitting at a desk speed? Walking speed? :roll:

DC said:
What's funny? "Moving parts", per your insinuation - that the airliner was taken somewhere else and destroyed in secret, making the more complex. The victims were also taken somewhere else and murdered in secret. Their remains were destroyed in secret. Meanwhile, also per your insinuation (insinuation only because you're offering no retort, but smileys), a missile or bomb was planted, liars were recruited to regale us of tales of the plane hitting and then engineers were also brought in to cut down lamp posts. Parts of a similar plane, of a similar color were also driven to the scene and planted. Pictures from a different wreckage, but similar, according to you, were also presented to the public.

- I never said the airliner was taken anywhere. It was obviously not an airliner that hit the Pentagon is what I do say, Please pay attention.

- I never said humans were taken somewhere & murdered, but given the atrocities committed, its not beyond the realm of the possible.

- I do say that something other than a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon.

- What "liars" are you speaking of? Please tell us who they are and what they supposedly said.

- Your pictures and parts / wreckage, which you said would have been made into confetti, but obviously were not, are simple fakes. Please actually read what I said before.

- And you continue to dodge the reporter's report and his video of the site which do not show wreckage, do not show human remains.

- I seriously doubt that Shankesville is the topic of the OP. Please read the OP title & contents.

- What we need is a real, verifiable, observed, legit investigation to determine the details, as I said before. Please pay attention.

Regards, Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.


Return to “The 9/11 Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest