In practice, what actually happened was that the communist leaders sat on the sidelines as the violent masses fratricidally overthrew the established order in their society, and then after the civil war was over would insert themselves into the leading roles of the newly formed socialist governments. The communist theorizers predicted that revolutions would happen all over Europe. Apart from Russia, this did not take place and instead, in response, various anti-communist movements: namely Fascism and National Socialism, took hold.
The communists were not deterred by this, so they began formulating a new strategy to push their agenda. This new strategy has become known as "Cultural Marxism" which combined Marx's theories with the Jew Sigmund Freud, and was intended to tear down all established western traditions, especially the nuclear family. Many of the major Cultural Marxist thinkers in the 1920's and 30's were Jewish intellectuals involved in the "Institute of Social Research" in Frankfurt, Germany: known as the "Frankfurt School." They developed a concept known as "Critical theory" to attack western culture and traditions as inherently oppressive. The modern manifestation of this ideological movement has essentially become what we know as "Political correctness" and any objection to the established agenda is smeared as "racist" or "sexist" or "homophobic" or "xenophobic" or whatever.
When Hitler came to power in 1930s Germany, the Cultural Marxists lost power and many of them fled to America, Britain or Canada. Of course, World War II eventually broke out and Germany was defeated, so a large number of them returned to Germany with a thirst for vengeance. They claimed that the so-called "Holocaust" and the NSDAP's rise to power was a result of "sexual repression" and an "Authoritarian" personality. Does this sound unbelievable? One of the most destructive movements that resulted from this poisonous ideology is known as the "Kinderladen" movement. The Kinderladen movement was inspired by the jewish "Father of the sexual revolution" Wilhelm Reich and a book known as "The Authoritarian Personality" which was written by a team of Frankfurt School Jews, headed by the jew Theodor Adorno.
The book "The Authoritarian Personality" was essentially a study trying to figure out what caused the rise of Hitler in Germany, and claimed that it was due to an "authoritarian upbringing" and "sexual repression" -- according to Wikipedia:
The impetus of The Authoritarian Personality was the Holocaust, the attempted genocidal extinction of European Jews by Adolf Hitler's National Socialist party. Adorno had been a member of the "Frankfurt School", a group of philosophers and Marxist theorists who fled Germany when Hitler shut down their Institute for Social Research. Adorno et al. were thus motivated by a desire to identify and measure factors that were believed to contribute to antisemitic and fascist traits. The book was part of a "Studies in Prejudice" series sponsored by the American Jewish Committee's Department of Scientific Research.
The Kinderladen movement took "anti-authoritarianism" to an extreme level, where parents simply did not interfere with their children in any way. According to a paper published by the Journal of Curriculum Theorizing:
The Kinderladen movement in 1970s West Germany, a critical forerunner of present-day alternative and free schools in Germany, began as an effort to raise children to be disobedient in all senses. Early cooperative “pedagogy groups” (Pädagogen-Gruppen) directly confronted German child-rearing emphases such as obedience, and also cleanliness and orderliness, prominent in the Nazi era and still earlier. Group members perceived these emphases as creating a fixation on authority and producing a deeply anxious sexuality. They believed these child-rearing practices continued to reproduce poisonous elements of family, community, and society.
Essentially, Kinderladen activists were psychologically paralyzed by Holocaust propaganda and wanted to make up for the sins of their parents and grandparents, for the purpose of "preventing another Holocaust" from ever happening. American Jewish professor of history Dagmar Herzog wrote in her book "Sex After Fascism", about these "experimental antiauthoritarian daycare centers for 2- to 5-year-olds organized by New Left activists" and described how American leftists were horrified by what they saw there. She wrote (my emphasis):
American New Leftists on travels in Europe remember how stunned they were in some of their first encounters with their West German counterparts. Young West German parents let their children, while covered in dirt, walk the streets and ride streetcars. They allowed their children to pummel them; they never slapped back. And when asked why they encouraged their children’s disobedience, the parents answered simply: “Because of Auschwitz.”
In February 1969, "Der Stern" a popular magazine in West Germany published an article criticizing the Kinderladen movement. According to Herzog, it referred to the children as:
“little leftists with big rights” whose environment was chaotic and filthy, whose parents engaged in wife swapping, and who were allowed to bash in each other’s heads with blocks and splatter the walls of their centers with paint.
In response to this article, Kinderladen activists retaliated against "Der Stern" by breaking into the West Berlin Press Office and smearing human feces all over its walls. The JCT article wrote on page 150:
They collected used diapers from the city’s Kinderladen for three days. Then children and adults carried the diapers in garbage bags back to the Press Office, entered the newly painted chambers, and smeared the walls with the diapers’ contents, to express their displeasure with those who had control of voice and opinion in the public sphere.
Herzog explained on page 167 of her book:
Indeed, aside from the general encouragement for children to be selfand peer- rather than adult-directed, the vociferous defense of child sexuality was precisely the heart of early Kinderladen activism. The activists did not just permit the children to run naked and play with their own and each other’s bodies (ﬁg. 4.2). They also applauded and publicized the most intimate details of the children’s sexual explorations.
Herzog also mentions some "flagrantly excessive" pamphlets detailing the Kinderladen activities:
[A] detailed description of a scene of (expressly adult-encouraged) genital touching between a little boy and a little girl within the Kommune 2, and another scene in which the same little girl attempted to fit an adult penis (which, after she had asked, she had been permitted to stroke to the point of erection) into her tiny vagina (it turned out to be, as she herself “determined resignedly, ‘Too big’ ”).
This disgustingly abhorrent pedophilia was directly influenced by the Freudian extremist Wilhlem Reich, mentioned above, who was totally obsessed with child sexuality and the alleged social ills that resulted from its suppression. His 1945 book "The Sexual Revolution" which was the foundation of the 1960s sexual revolution, wastes no space, and describes this in the preface:
Social and individual sex-economy have established the fact that suppression of the love life of children and adolescents is the central mechanism for producing enslaved subordinates and economic serfs.
A "Der Spiegel" article was published called "The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far" where it described a Psychology Institute in Berlin that had a "basement [that] was used as an “observation station” to study sexual behavior in children." Further:
The article continues to describeAlmost every day, the students played games that involved taking off their clothes, reading porno magazines together and pantomiming intercourse. According to the records, a “sex exercise” was conducted on Dec. 11 and a “fucking hour” on Jan. 14.
an account of a parents’ evening where one of the mothers said that she stripped naked in front of her son so that he could “inspect” her. In the process, the woman spread her legs to expose her private parts for his inspection. The game ended when the boy stuck a pencil into his mother’s vagina. The parents also spent a long time discussing whether it was a good idea to have sex with their own children, so as to demonstrate the “naturalness” of sexual intercourse.
A documentary about the Kinderladen movement called "Erziehung zum Ungehorsam" (Educating for Disobedience) aired on German TV in December 1969. According to Herzog
The film included a brief scene from Stuttgart in which a little girl casually attached a cardboard penis to a cutout doll along with hair, nose, eyes and lips. It also incorporated a one minute scene of “playing doctor” in Frankfurt in which one little boy painted in watercolor on another’s erect penis while antiauthoritarian parents and educators explained the importance of not only tolerating but assertively affirming child sexuality.
The documentary is available on youtube, although I don't recommend anyone watch it:
On top of simply oversexualizing children, the mentally insane Kinderladen crowd were also obsessed with feces, even allowing their children to defecate all over themselves. Sigmund Freud's [ridiculous and debunked] theories talked about an anal stage in which a person could become fixated at (along iwth "oral" and "phallic"), and grow up with mental disorders causing them to be fixated on them, resuling in such things as "anal personalities" in his derangedm ind. Of course, there's no scientific basis for this, but the Kinderladen activists were shamed into believe this nonsense based on Holocaust guilt. Herzog writes (my emphasis):
As the reference to the Jews of “yesterday” already suggests, in the activists’ efforts to explain the connections between overbearing parents, suppressed pleasures, and aggressions toward others, the Nazi past figured uneasily. The Third Reich was most frequently invoked when activists sought to demonstrate the broader political import and antifascist value of their pro-sex and antifamily values position. In their critique of even liberal sex education guides’ tendency to downplay pleasure and emphasize the dangers of venereal disease, for example, the Berlin-Charlottenburg collective stingingly pointed out that “It is well known that the National Socialists combined their fascist racial theory with the irrational warning against the decadent Jews, because they were supposedly responsible for sexually transmitted diseases.” Moreover, the Charlottenburgers observed at another point, anyone who insisted on the “hallowed” importance of the mother-child bond was “simply confirming what clerics, National Socialists, and Christian Democrats have already for a long time been preaching from their moral pulpits about ‘the smallest cell of the state—the family.’” A father who worked in the Berlin-Neukoelln Kinderladen informed a reporter from Der Stern with coy insolence that not only did the parents allow the children to masturbate and play sex games but also that “Many children were already toilet-trained. Now they shit in their pants again. They’re repeating the anal phase. That’s good. Did you know that most concentration camp guards had anal difficulties in their childhood?”
Herzog continues to describe how some Kinderladen members wrote a book which
placed the anal phase and the Holocaust together at the center of political theory. Punitive toilet training, the authors contended, led to authoritarian personalities with sadistic fantasies, who oppressed minorities; preoccupation with cleanliness was part and parcel of a mindset that sent people “into the oven.”
Of course, the number one focus was to destroy the nuclear family. Herzog described:
But above all, and most frequently, activists railed at the institution that they felt was responsible for their own crippling: the nuclear family.
Breaking down traditional family structure is a central theme of marxism, and the Communist Manifesto explains this quite well:
Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
The solution, for the Kinderladen activists, was for children to be raised in communes, with a "deliberate rotation of care-givers."
Daniel Cohn-Bendit is a radical Jewish marxist politician from Germany and France who was heavily involved in the Kinderladen movement. He was nicknamed "Danny the Red" for being so heavily involved in communist agitation. In his 1975 book "Der grosse Basar" (The Grand Bazaar) he wrote:
My flirtations with all children soon acquired a definitely erotic character. I could sense how young girls aged five had already learned how to get off with me...
It happened several times that some children opened my codpiece and started caressing me. According to the circumstances of each case, I reacted differently, but the children’s wishes posed problems for me… when they insisted, I caressed them in return.
In Germany, the anti-authoritarian movement has had its strongest impact in the field of education…(Wilhelm) Reich and Marx were the pillars of this new movement. Freud was less important, because he had done objective research on sexuality, whereas Reich represented the fight for sexuality, in particular for the sexuality of younger people.
This perverted freak even boasted about his sexual activities with Kinderladen children during a French TV show appearance in the 1980s:
[EDIT: The following YouTube video has been removed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXGVjxX5uDk
You can view a backup version (without subtitles) at one of the following links:
Title: "Intervention de Daniel Cohn-Bendit à Apostrophe en 1982."
Dailymotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9jasr or https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x9kq78
The question is now: why is this relevant? What is the point of this thread? I have discussed the Holocaust with many people, and many times I have convinced people that the 6 million + gas chambers is simply a lie. Even if they accept this, sometimes they ask "OK, so what? This happened in the 1940s, and that time is over. So what difference does it really make now?"
Ultimately, the Holocaust story was the entire basis and justification for this subversive anti-German movement. When these German parents were asked why they let their children do whatever they wanted, they responded "Because of Auschwitz."
The [neo-]marxist roots of the "Sexual Revolution" are often not well-known, but it is clear that the memory of the Holocaust was not only the driving force but also the justification for it. The Kinderladen movement is simply an extreme example, but we can all notice how divorce, premarital sex, sexual deviancy and promiscuity have skyrocketed since the 1960s, in large part as a result of this massive propaganda campaign.
1. Peter Appelbaum, Belinda Davis (2013) "Curriculum for Disobedience: Raising Children to Transform Adults"
PDF: http://journal.jctonline.org/index.php/ ... /420/pdf_1 or http://web.archive.org/web/201907211927 ... /420/pdf_1
2. Herzog, Dagmar (2005) "Sex after fascism: memory and morality in twentieth-century Germany" https://archive.is/qbuC7
3. Reich, Wilhelm (1945) "The Sexual Revolution: Toward a Self-Regulating Character Structure"
PDF: http://www.wilhelmreichtrust.org/sexual_revolution.pdf or http://web.archive.org/web/201907211927 ... lution.pdf
Google Books: https://books.google.com/books?id=AagE4 ... escents%22
4. Fleischhauer and Hollersen (2010) The Sexual Revolution and Children: How the Left Took Things Too Far. https://archive.is/yx3TV
5. Karl Marx. Communist Manifesto. Chapter II. Proletarians and Communists. https://archive.is/s03ss
6. C-FAM (2013) European Parliament member promotes pedophilia as part of the sexual revolution. https://archive.is/qeF1s