Not just pithy but clever and difficult for the believers to argue against.
Very articulate and always worth listening to James Delingpole, a British journalist, also writes for Breitbart. He positively rages against the climate change hoax. In this particular piece he shows an article by Tony Heller listing his top five reasons why Climate Change is total bull. So why am I showing this here? Because I have always thought the parallels between the two cases are so strong and if you look at the climate change reasons shown below and then swap climate change for holocaust the case is made. Man made Climate Change and the holocaust are the new religions of the age.
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/0 ... _98UQ8kF0g
Climate alarmism is just a modern version of man’s primal superstitions about cataclysmic natural events. But these fears are baseless for there is no legitimate evidence to show that “extreme weather is increasing or sea level rise is accelerating.”
Climate alarmism is a form of Groupthink — or, as Heller puts it, the Emperor’s New Clothes. This Groupthink requires ignoring the evidence and instead deferring to the opinions of a very small body of parti pris “experts”.
If the case for the “global warming” were as strong as these experts say, the debate would be over by now. Instead, all of their “apocalyptic predictions” have failed miserably. What reason do we have to believe them after all this time?
Climate alarmism is entirely dependent on graphs and computer models which rely on cherry-picked or corrupt data. Few if any of these models have come close to forecasting real world outcomes.
The proposed solutions to “climate change” are “unworkable, dangerous and useless.”
Now let's look at the same statements but adjusted slightly for the holocaust hoax.
The Holocaust myth is just a modern version of man’s primal superstitions about persecution of minorities. But these fears are baseless for there is no legitimate evidence to show that “the holocaust is the most documented event in human history.”
The Holocaust myth is a form of Groupthink — or, the Emperor’s New Clothes. This Groupthink requires ignoring the evidence and instead deferring to the opinions of a very small body of parti pris “experts”.
If the case for the “the Holocaust” were as strong as these experts say, the debate would be over by now. Instead, all of their “claims of genocide against the Jews” have failed miserably. What reason do we have to believe them after all this time?
The Holocaust is entirely dependent on unverified claims, dodgy witness statements and millions of 'survivors' who couldn't possibly have survived the Holocaust if it were true, and rely on cherry-picked or corrupt claims with no forensic support. Few if any of these Holocaust claims have come close to proving the claims of gas chambers and six million deaths.
The proposed solutions to “anti-semitism” are “unworkable, dangerous and useless.”