Here anyone can see what a real excavation of real mass graves looks like, Katyn:viewtopic.php?f=6&t=758
The Stalin / Soviet era mass murders present problems much different from the non-existent 'holocaust' mass graves.
The alleged 'holocaust' mass graves are said to be located at precisely
known sites, i.e.: Auschwitz - 1,250,000 Jews claimed, Treblinka - 900,000 Jews claimed, Sobibor - 250,000 Jews claimed, Babi Yar - 34,000 Jews claimed, etc.
In fact the alleged 'holocaust' sites are marked off, covered, many are physically obstructed from any attempt to excavate. The point being that we know exactly where they are supposed to be, yet we do not see them.
To date there has not been a single verifiable excavation showing the alleged massive human remains of Jews that are claimed to exist in such precisely claimed locations, not one.
There has been some 'holocaust' work easily exposed as laughable frauds. Think about the claimed work of Haimi, Kola, Sturdy-Colls, and claimed immediate post war Communist efforts; all thoroughly debunked. It's all here at this forum.
The Stalin / Soviet era mass graves locations, while indeed some have been found, are a crap shoot to find. Many are thought to be in rather generalized & isolated areas which makes it very challenging for a few energetic people to find. Certainly know one was about to put up signs at the time indicating the exact locations, they would have ended up dead themselves.
Ideally the post USSR Russian government would assist with resources in uncovering these sites, but it is obvious that they have no interest in doing so. They still toss around the notion that the communist Soviets were the good guys and they had to 'break a few eggs to make an omelette'.
Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish "holocaust" and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the "survivors"? Because it "dishonors the dead"? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble."
- Gerard Menuhin / Revisionist Jew, son of famous violinist