The Unsourced Excerpts of Joseph Goebbels' Diary

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Member
Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

The Unsourced Excerpts of Joseph Goebbels' Diary

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 3 days 33 minutes ago (Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:23 pm)

According to http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/how ... ust-denial
Goebbels' diary, for example, was barely rescued from being sold as 7,000 pages of scrap paper, but buried in the scattered manuscript were several telling entries (as translated in Lochner, The Goebbels Diaries, 1948, pp. 86, 147-148):

February 14, 1942: The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it. The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.

March 27, 1942: The procedure is a pretty barbaric one and not to be described here more definitely. Not much will remain of the Jews. On the whole it can be said that about 60 per cent of them will have to be liquidated whereas only 40 per cent can be used for forced labor.
Here's the problem with this. We do not have the supposed orginal German text of these entries. Only the original diary of Joseph Goebbels would suffice for absolute proof of validity. If the only proof we have for the authenticity of these entries are based upon an English translation with no original German source material to be found, then the belief that these entries are valid is not really a belief worth having.
More reading here: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=3793&start=30



avatar
Breker
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 668
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Re: The Unsourced Excerpts of Joseph Goebbels' Diary

Postby Breker » 3 days 10 minutes ago (Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:47 pm)

Why should anyone accept a highly biased Jewish source, like the Jewish Virtual Library ?
Such sources have demonstrated over & over again their agenda and determination to concoct false 'translations' and claim evidence which does not exist.
Their typical tactics are to say words mean what they do not, ex.: they say the use of 'deportation' in German meant 'extermination' in English. Or that 'uproot' in German means 'murder' in English. Then they say that the German used "codewords" to issue the orders for 'exterminations' for which their is no proof. :lol:
All rather comical, and quite the con job.
B.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests