WTC-7 symmetrical free fall collapse

Moderator: Moderator

Pia Kahn
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 335
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:57 am

WTC-7 symmetrical free fall collapse

Postby Pia Kahn » 6 months 1 week ago (Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:35 pm)

David Chandler proves with simple Newtonian physics, why the collapse of world trade center building 7 at free fall on 9/11 is in contradiction with the official theory, i.e. the official theory violates the laws of phyiscs. The observed collapse points to the use of explosives and/or incendiaries for a controlled demolition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... BmyPW6gGGI

6 WTC7 Part 5 47 Stories in 7 Seconds - ESO - Experts Speak Out

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/vid ... all-part-1

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/vid ... all-part-2

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/vid ... all-part-3

https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/tec ... -7-on-9-11

Now that we know that building 7 didn't collaps due to office fires, we must find out who is responsibel for 9-11.

Well, we do have one clue. Chandler doesn't merely refute the official theory published by NIST, he proves that their analysis is fraudulent. Why should NIST cover up a crime? Go figure!
Last edited by Pia Kahn on Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.

Pia Kahn
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 335
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:57 am

Re: WTC-7 symmetrical free fall collapse

Postby Pia Kahn » 6 months 1 week ago (Thu Jan 03, 2019 11:37 pm)

sorry admin, i didn't want to post this twice. Please deleate the second post.
If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.


Return to “The 9/11 Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests