"European Court of Human Rights" Rules in Favor of Conviction of Bishop Richard Williamson For Holocaust Comments

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
JLAD Prove Me Wrong
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2018 8:35 pm

"European Court of Human Rights" Rules in Favor of Conviction of Bishop Richard Williamson For Holocaust Comments

Postby JLAD Prove Me Wrong » 8 months 3 weeks ago (Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:35 pm)

According to https://www.thelocal.de/20190131/europe ... conviction

The European Court of Human Rights ruled Thursday that Germany was within its rights to convict British bishop Richard Williamson of Holocaust denial.
Williamson, 78, sparked an outcry in 2009 by denying that the Nazis used gas chambers during the systematic murder of six million Jews during World War II.

His lawyers tried to argue he should not had been convicted because the comment was made during a television interview broadcast in Sweden, where Holocaust denial is not illegal.

But the interview was recorded in Germany, where it is a criminal offence to dispute the mass murder of Jews by the Nazis.

Williamson was convicted of incitement to hatred and ordered to pay a €12,000 fine, which was reduced to €1,800 in 2013 after a series of legal challenges.

The European court said it found no reason to disagree with the German ruling that Williamson's "denial and downplaying of the genocide perpetrated against the Jews had disparaged the dignity of the Jewish victims".

It pointed out that Williamson knew his comments were illegal in Germany, and confirmed that since the interview was recorded there it was legal to prosecute the case in the country.

He did not seek to make special arrangements to ensure that the interview would not be available beyond Sweden, and would have been aware that it would have been accessible elsewhere via satellite TV and the internet, it agreed.

Williamson was formerly a member of the ultra-conservative Society of Saint Pius X but was kicked out in 2012 for disobeying orders from his superiors.

He was excommunicated by the Vatican in 1988 after he was ordained by a fundamentalist archbishop against papal orders.

He was allowed back into the Church in 2009 as part of a move by then pope Benedict to heal a rift between the Vatican and fundamentalists.

That decision came days after the airing of Williamson's Holocaust-denying Swedish interview. An embarrassed Vatican said it had not been aware of the comments.

Williamson was excommunicated for a second time in 2015 after he consecrated a new bishop in Brazil despite not being authorized to do so.


So the European "Court of Human Rights" has defended Germany's fine, even though Bishop Williamson wasn't in Germany, but because it was recorded in Germany.

Germany isn't just a police state. It is a ZOG bully state, which persecutes people who say things they don't like outside of Germany.

Not only that, but article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights states

Freedom of expression
1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right
shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart
information and ideas without interference by public authority
and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States
from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema
enterprises.
2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it
duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities,
conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and
are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national
security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention
of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for
the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing
the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for
maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.


This entire thing is a miscarriage of justice, a kangaroo court if you will.
If your beliefs cannot stand up to your own sincere scrutiny and skeptical evaluation, they are not worth having.

https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/ ... t-details/

Goethe
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2003 3:41 am

Re: "European Court of Human Rights" Rules in Favor of Conviction of Bishop Richard Williamson For Holocaust Comments

Postby Goethe » 8 months 3 weeks ago (Fri Feb 01, 2019 12:20 am)

This demonstrates quite clearly that the "Holocaust" mythology does hold up to open debate.
Otherwise there would be no reason to ban free speech about it.

The name "European Court of Human Rights", is that meant to be a joke?
"The coward threatens when he is safe".
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Spatton
Member
Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 12:20 pm

Re: "European Court of Human Rights" Rules in Favor of Conviction of Bishop Richard Williamson For Holocaust Comments

Postby Spatton » 8 months 2 weeks ago (Fri Feb 01, 2019 4:34 pm)

In my very first post here I wondered what the European court of "human rights" would do in such a case seeing as they decided that denying the armenian genocide is protected by freedom of speech, a fundamental human right. So now I have my answer.

The only logical conclusion is, that according to the european court of human rights, an armenian life is worth less than a jewish life.

Breker
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Europa

Re: "European Court of Human Rights" Rules in Favor of Conviction of Bishop Richard Williamson For Holocaust Comments

Postby Breker » 8 months 2 weeks ago (Fri Feb 01, 2019 5:53 pm)

Spatton wrote:The only logical conclusion is, that according to the european court of human rights, an armenian life is worth less than a jewish life.

According to Jews themselves all other lives are worth less than their lives.
B.
Revisionists are just the messengers, the impossibility of the "Holocaust" narrative is the message.

EtienneSC
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:27 pm

Re: "European Court of Human Rights" Rules in Favor of Conviction of Bishop Richard Williamson For Holocaust Comments

Postby EtienneSC » 8 months 2 weeks ago (Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:50 am)

The problem with the ECHR is that its rights are not absolute, but have to be balanced against an indefinite and expanding number of other rights claimed by third parties. Hence there is growing challenge to and uncertainty about the exercise of what ought to be basic and inalienable rights.


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AstraPlaneti, MSN [Bot] and 1 guest