Revisionism: a summary of basic points

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9996
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Revisionism: a summary of basic points

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 7 years ago (Sat Nov 30, 2002 10:24 pm)

Noted Swiss Revisionist Juergen Graf has compiled a nice summary of Revisionist points. While certainly not exhaustive, it is a good compilation of basics. I have listed the url for the full text, as well as an outline of the chapters. Have a look.
Any in depth discussion on individual points would probably be best addressed in separate threads per point
- Hannover.

http://www.ety.com/HRP/booksonline/graf/toc.htm

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The author's biography!

Foreword

Revisonism and pluralism: An Introduction by Mario Consoli

The throttling of pluralism

The crisis and Man and the State

The criminalization of Fascism and National Socialism

The role of the Official Version of History

Some standard criticisms of Revisionism

At the crossroads: terror or dialogue?

CHAPTER I

THE ACCUSATION

Holocaust beliefs since 1945

Compared to the Holocaust, all other "Nazi crimes" pale into insignificance!

"The 3 million non-Jewish Poles"

"The 500,000 gypsies"

Medical experiments on human beings

Euthanasia

The Holocaust as a religion

Why nearly everybody believes in the Holocaust

CHAPTER II

THE FUNCTION OF THE HOLOCAUST IN THE WORLD SINCE 1945

Founding of the state of Israel and the violation of the rights of Palestinians

Immunity of Jews from criticism

Covering up Allied atrocities in WW II

Creating contempt for the German people

Rendering impossible all objective discussion of National Socialism

Creating contempt for all forms of nationalism except for Jewish nationalism

CHAPTER III

THE REVISIONISTS

The claims of the revisionists

A former concentration camp inmate as revisionist pioneer: Paul Rassinier

The media campaign against revisionism

State prosecutors and judges as watch dogs for the official version of history

The Waterloo of the official version of history

CHAPTER IV

WHAT IF THE REVISIONISTS ARE RIGHT?

What really happened?

Up to 1941: The Reichs government demands Jewish emigration

After 1941: The mass deportation into camps and ghettos

The death rate in the camps and its causes

The shootings on the Eastern front

CHAPTER V

OH, WHAT A TANGLED WEB WE WEAVE...

The number of Auschwitz victims

"Soap of human fat"

Potpourri of Nazi extermination methods

a) pneumatic hammers

b) electric baths

c) electrical assembly line killing

d) atomic bombs

e) burning alive

f) steam chambers

g) suffocation by pumping all the air out of the death chambers

h) quicklime trains

i) chambers with submergible, electrified flooring

j) blood poisoning

k) drowning

l) chlorine gas, assembly-line shootings, boiling water, acid

The location of the gas chambers

Phase I (from 1946: almost every camp had one or more gas chamber(s)

Phase II (from August 1960): no gas chambers in the Old Reich

Phase III (from 1983): Return of the gas chambers in the West

The gas chambers existed; oh no, they didn't; oh yes, they did

CHAPTER VI

IS TODAY'S VERSION OF THE HOLOCAUST ANY MORE BELIEVABLE THAN THOSE OF THE PAST?

Claims made by standard literature

a) The extermination programme

b) Implementation of the execution programme

c) The secrecy of the extermination programme

d) The six "extermination camps"

e) The murder weapon

f) The number of victims and operating periods of the "extermination camps"

g) The destruction of the corpses

CHAPTER VII

PHYSICAL PROOFS OF THE HOLOCAUST

Are the claims made by standard literature believable?

CHAPTER VIII

DOCUMENTARY PROOFS OF THE HOLOCAUST

Raul Hilberg, Danuta Czech, Jean-Claude Pressac: Three "experts" dip into their bag of tricks

a) Professor Hilberg scrpes the bottom of the barrel for proof, but finds none

b) How Danuta Czech's Calendarium came to her conclusions as to the number of the gassed

c) Jean-Claude Pressac's "criminal traces"

"The Germans destroyed all the documents"

Conjuring up "proof"

Falsified documents

a) The Wannsee-Protocoll

b) The document of 28 June 1943 on the capacity of the crematoria of Auschwitz

Documents of dubious authenticity

a) The Goebbels-Diary passages of 27 March 1942

b) The two Himmler speeches of October 1943

c) The business letter relating to the ordering of "gas testers"

Undoubtedly genuine but falsely interpreted documents

a) The passage on the "Hebraic Race Perverters" from Mein Kampf

b) Documents on the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question"

c) Documents on "Special Actions", etc.

d) The Korrherr Report: masterpiece of misinterpretation

Documents which contradict the extermination theory

CHAPTER IX

EYEWITNESSES TO THE GAS CHAMBERS AT AUSCHWITZ

A few of the technical and scientific impossibilities in the eyewitness reports

a) Blue vapour floating over the bodies of the victims

b) Bluish discoloration of the bodies

c) Impossibly large numbers of people per square metre crammed together in the gas chambers

d) Flames shooting out of the chimneys

e) Impossibly great numbers of bodies per muffle in the crematory ovens

f) Cremation of bodies without fuel

g) Burning of bodies in ditches

h) Use of human fat flowing down off the bodies as fuel during cremations

i) Use of methanol as fuel

Four central impossibilities of the eyewitness testimonies

a) Impossibly short cremation times per corpse

b) Introduction of Zyklon B through non-existent openings

c) Opening the gas chamber doors and removing the bodies after impossibly short ventilation times

d) Removal of bodies without gas masks

e) Sonderkommandos working in clouds of cyanide gas

CHAPTER X

THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AUSCHWITZ LEGEND

How the eyewitness reports were coordinated

How the courts faked "evidence" of the Holocaust

A perfect example: Dr J.P. Kremer

The Father of the Auschwitz Lie

The "murder weapon" Zyklon B: refutation of the lie

CHAPTER XI

AUSCHWITZ: SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF THE CRIME SCENE

The Leuchter report

The Rudolf Report

Carlo Mattogno and Franco Deana: the crematoria

John Ball and the air-photo evidence

CHAPTER XII

THE OTHER "EXTERMINATION CAMPS"

Preliminary remarks

Majdanek

Chelmno

Sobibor

Belzec

Treblinka

The scientific studies

a) Friedrich Paul Berg's study of the "murder weapon"

b) Arnulf Neumaier's study of the cremations

What were the "pure extermination camps" really?

CHAPTER XIII

THE GAS VANS AND MASS SHOOTINGS

"A pure product of fantasy"

The Einsatzgruppen and the "Massacre of Babi Yar"

CHAPTER XIV

SIX MILLION MIRACLES

"A unique mass murder"

A stroll through the "free press" of the world

A few examples

Elie Wiesel's miraculous escapes

How Jewish Holocaust "survivors" cheated death

CHAPTER XV

WHERE DID THEY GO?

The origins of the mythical Six Million figure

Wolfgang Benz and Walter Sanning

Carl Nording's research

The exemplary case of one "gassing victim": Jenny Spritzer

300,000 "Holocaust survivors" in Israel in 1996

Questions still open

CHAPTER XVI

THE INVISIBLE ELEPHANT

CHAPTER XVII

THE NESSUS SHIRT

The Revenge of the Centaur

The refusal of the exterminationists to retreat one single inch

The Garaudy case

The confession of an orthodox historian

Korzec and Goldhagen: a new version of the lie

The evolution of the Holocaust Lie: A summary

CONCLUSIONS

THE TRIAL OF GRAF INQUISITION, PART 1

THE TRIAL OF GRAF INQUISITION, PART 2

REVISIONIST BIBLIOGRAPHY

tally
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:35 pm

tally

Postby tally » 1 decade 6 years ago (Thu Jan 01, 2004 11:48 pm)

What are the basic points of why the Jews were confined to camps?

A. Due to Zionists desire for state of Israel, the politic body decided to openly declare its allegiance to Great Britain and this was considered treason of Jews by the German government. Not then being able to trust Jews, the Jews were confined to camps until they could either post passage to another country or be shipped directly to Great Britain. The Jews were a threat to German national security.

B. Hitler was a religious fanatic who believed Jesus was coming at any moment and the pressure caused him to pre-empt a war. To safeguard the Jews they were confined as "saved".

C. Due to poor economic conditions and no manufacturing base providing a healthy sustainable enviroment, the Jews were blamed because they were richer and did not help out their fellow non Jewish neighbors.

D. Everybody in Germany hated Jews because Jews had arms down to their ankles and big noses and carried a distinct odorous smell.

User avatar
Scott
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 7:00 am

Re: tally

Postby Scott » 1 decade 6 years ago (Fri Jan 02, 2004 4:53 am)

tally wrote:What are the basic points of why the Jews were confined to camps?

Because it was wartime and Jews and their dependents were considered subversive, hostile, and even dangerous enemy aliens. The same thing was done in the USA against Japs who lived on the West coast, even if they were U.S. citizens or were born in the U.S. However, in the case of the Japs they were not subjected to forced-labor and separated from their families. Of course, there was no critical labor shortage in the U.S., either.

According to Holohistorian Karin Orth, before the war there was hardly more than 25 thousand in German concentration camps, including common criminals, and even this figure had quintupled in the late 1930s when a labor shortage had prompted jailing for vagrancy and more strongly enforcing laws against other asocials like prostitutes and male homosexuals. Nevertheless, the incarceration rate in Germany before the war, including political prisoners, was very low and not anywhere near comparable to the U.S. today. Also, the rate of capital punishment was about the same as in the USA at that time, which peaked in the 1930s.

Of course the war changed everything and the concentration camp population exploded just as the labor shortage imploded, caused by wartime industrial expansion and the mobilization of workers in the military.

A "useless eater" like Anne Frank survived Auschwitz and died of typhus at Belsen at the end of the war. Not to say that the Jews were not brutalized, but if the Germans had really been trying to kill her it wouldn't have been hard.

:D


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests