Max dodges the photos I linked to that reveals no "camouflage", but still insists it was there, odd. And then he says that the phantom camouflage was moved around at certain times....I guess so that it would not be camouflaging what the tale says was it supposed to be camouflaging in the 1st place... odd again.
Then he tries to say the scribbly lines were both the "insertion" holes, shadows, AND paths made by the SS, even though there is no distinction between them....they just magically blended together, right. He claims there are shadows from the 'holes', which as I stated and he dodged, do not go at the same angle as the chimney shadow....that's a major problem for Max and the believers. Tell me how the Germans could manage to get the shadows going in a different direction, Max.
Naturally, he dodges this study by Rudolf:
He cites Provan, but then dodges the link that shoots down Provan, who, by the way, contradicts Mazal, whose photo he posted as "proof", oops.
Max, come on over. We all used to believe just like you. No shame in admitting you have been duped.