The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
Pepper
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:47 am

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Pepper » 9 years 10 months ago (Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:47 pm)

jnovitz, I'm moving your questions over to the

Treblinka study by Krege

thread.

Pepper
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:47 am

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Pepper » 9 years 10 months ago (Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:21 pm)

RM’s "answers" to the 27 Treblinka questions.

1 - So where exactly are all these alleged “huge mass graves” filled with millions of pounds of bone fragments, tens of millions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings?

RM’s A - In the present day Treblinka extermination camp memorial area, most probably under the areas numbered "2", "3" and "4" on the annotated present-day air photo.

Note the phrase “most probably,” meaning that he actually does not know, thus, his answer wasn’t an answer, just a conjectural response. Note also that he totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past in which he claimed that anti-investigation barriers #2 & #3 don’t cover any human remains at all and that approximately 40% of the alleged remains are uncovered. His story changes constantly.

2 - Do you believe that it’s possible to murder 870,000 people and not leave behind a single trace of your crime?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question and instead responded to the question with a question.

3 - How hard would it be to locate / prove the existence of the alleged “huge mass graves” if they did in fact exist?

RM’s A - Prove the existence of: as hard as it was to collect the pertinent evidence to mass murder and the mass graves necessarily related thereto… Locate: as hard as it will be to remove the memorial stones and the concrete plate on which they are set and to identify the outlines of the mass graves by means of excavation, core drilling or GPR technology.

Note he’s suggesting that one would have to remove the anti-investigation barriers before one could do any excavations, core drilling or GPR, thus contradicting himself on the whole Krege GPR issue. He also totally ignores the fact that there are two large areas right in the middle of anti-investigation barrier #4 which would allow for excavations, core drilling and GPR. Also, look again at the Krege video. It is possible to do at least some excavations, core drilling and GPR amongst the stones in the monument. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past in which he claimed that the anti-investigation barriers only cover a portion of the alleged mass graves / remains. His story changes constantly.

4 -What percentage of the allegedly murdered jews are buried in sections A?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “we don’t know” response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past about that area.

5 - B?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “we don’t know” response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past about that area.

6 - C?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “we don’t know” response.

He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past about that area. He has in the past claimed that virtually 100% of the alleged remains are currently buried in area C. (He’s told so many lies and has changed his story so many times that he himself no longer knows what to think. He has gotten to the point that he just says whatever is convenient to say at any given moment, any and all past statement be dammed.)

7 -What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #1?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response.

8 -What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #2?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response. Notice how he contradicts his answer to question #1.

9 -What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #3?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response. Notice how he contradicts his answer to question #1.

10 - What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #4?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question.

11 - Where are all the photos showing EXACTLY what was found under the anti-investigation barriers?

RM’s A - The photos above are not all the photos showing the aspect…

Note: Here he posts some photos that do NOT show what was covered with the anti-investigation barriers just prior to the building of the monument and instead tries to pass off photos that he says “show the aspect” of the areas, thus admitting that he can’t provide any photographic documentation of what was under the areas now covered by the anti-investigation areas just prior to their construction. (Sound familiar?)

12 - The remains of how many jews are buried under anti-investigation barriers: #1?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past about that area.

13 - #2?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past about that area. Note also the contradiction to the “answer” he gave for question #1.

14 - #3?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he’s made in the past about that area. Note also the contradiction to the “answer” he gave for question #1.

15 - #4?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question.

16 - The remains of how many jews are buried under all 4 anti-investigation barriers combined?

RM’s A – Assuming that these 4 memorial areas coincide with all of Treblinka's mass grave areas (which is not necessarily the case)… At least 780,863.

Note how he’s contradicting the answer he gave for question #3. Also note that of the alleged remains of the alleged “at least” 780,863 dead jews, he can’t locate / prove the existence of so much as one. NOT ONE!

17, 18, 19 & 20 - The remains of how many jews - in how many graves, are buried in each alleged mass graves area?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer any of these questions, but instead gave a “don’t know” response.

21 &22 - The remains of how many jews - in how many graves, are buried in both areas combined?

RM’s A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a “don’t know” response.

Note the large area that corresponds to Wiernik’s claimed mass graves locations which could be investigated without having to “remove the memorial stones and the concrete plate on which they are set,” thus totally contradicting his answer to question #3.

23 &24 – The remains of how many jews - in how many graves, are buried in Treblinka?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer this question.

25 – Can you locate / prove the existence of just one grave that contains just one tenth of one percent of the alleged mass murder?

RM’s A – His answer was mostly unintelligible gibberish. However, it was obviously not a yes, so that must mean it’s a no. Of course, the fact that he’s afraid to send any alleged proof of his being able to locate / prove the existence of just one grave that contains just one tenth of one percent of the alleged mass murder to skeptic magazine proves that he can’t, so again, the answer must be no.

26 – Why does THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward remain unclaimed?

RM’s A – One of the reasons is that Greg Gerdes doesn't dare to specify what his standards of evidence are…

Here RM spews a blatant lie. I’ve seen with my own eyes on other forums Mr. Gerdes explicitly telling RM (and which is also explicitly stated in the nafcash.com website) that the #1 standard of evidence, the one standard that has to be met before any other standards will even be discussed, is for any potential applicant to the reward money to first and foremost get their proof published in skeptic magazine, and that Michael Shermer / skeptic magazine are the initial arbiters of what standards of evidence the NAFH will accept, and that the NAFH will consider any and all evidence published in skeptic magazine. I have seen with my own eyes Mr. Gerdes tell RM that any questions concerning standards of evidence must first be vetted via Michael Shermer. It’s a two step process in which RM is too much of a coward to take the first step. I have also read on other forums Mr. Gerdes explicitly informed RM that AFTER his “proof” is vetted via publication in skeptic magazine, any negative action taken by Greg Gerdes / the NAFH, that RM or anyone else wishes to contest, can obviously be contested in an American court of justice, in which all applicable standards of evidence that RM wants to see applied would obviously be applied. That would be the last step in the process. A process that RM is making his a red herring out of because he knows he can’t get any proof asked for by the NAFH published in skeptic magazine. (And he now has the option of archaeology magazine: has he submitted anything to them yet?)

Why is RM pretending that he doesn’t know or understand all this when it’s in the public domain proving that he does?

It’s glaringly obvious that RM is deathly afraid to present his “proof” to said magazines, because he knows that even the fraud Shermer would not only reject, but laugh at his submittal. I.e. – RM is a liar and a coward.

RM’s A continues – …i.e. what he would accept as proof that so-and-so-many pounds of bone fragments or so-and-so-many teeth lie in a specific mass grave at Sobibor or Treblinka.

Here RM spews yet another lie. I’ve seen with my own eyes on other forums RM explicitly stating that he knew EXACTLY what Mr. Gerdes / the NAFH would consider as proof, and that is the physical quantification of the required amount of remains, which have been explicitly expressed on the nafacsh site, which again, I’ve seen with my own eyes and are in the public domain.

Is RM admitting that he’s never actually read the nafcah site?

RM’s A continues – …Another reason is that no one in his right mind would expect degenerate "White" trash like Greg Gerdes, who probably can barely manage to pay his trailer park rent, to ever be in conditions of paying $100,000 to a successful reward applicant.

Here RM spews yet another lie. I’ve seen with my own eyes on other forums Greg Gerdes explicitly telling RM exactly how the NAFH reward is funded and how any successful applicant would be paid the reward money and exactly what a person could easily do if they didn’t get their money as promised. It’s all so incredibly simple a child could understand it, yet RM is playing stupid. Or is he really that stupid?

So why is RM pretending that he doesn’t know or understand all this when it’s in the public domain proving that he does?

And why is money now such an issue to him when he has made numerous statements, again in the public domain, that the money issue is of little or no importance to him and that he was going to publish his “proof” in skeptic magazine whether he had a chance of getting the reward money or not? It’s yet another glaring contradiction and absolute proof that RM is a liar, coward and fraud.

The ONLY reason RM is lying so much about and crying for further changes in The Final Solution Forensic Challenge is because he simply cannot prove the existence of so much as one grave that contains so much as 1/10 of 1% of the alleged mass murder at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka. He knows he can’t pass even the fraudulent skeptics society’s standards of proof, thus we get the above lame excuses.

27 – Why do the jews shamelessly label those who have the intelligence to see through their absurd fraud as “haters” and endeavor to persecute anyone who refuses to believe their physically impossible Treblinka holocaust fable?

RM’s A – RM refused to answer the question.

RM’s “answers” and non answers to the above 27 questions demonstrate conclusive evidence that would be considered by a US court of justice duly applying the pertinent rules of evidence as proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a certifiably insane and emotional disturbed pathological liar and congenital coward.

And there is one other question here that just begs to be asked. Why doesn’t Michael Shermer publish in his very own skeptic magazine proof of the location of just one grave at Treblinka, a camp he himself allegedly investigated and concluded that 900,000 jews were killed there, which contains just one tenth of one percent of the alleged mass murder, and cut out the middleman RM? Shermer could have the "proof" in the next issue, and then go after Mr. Gerdes “in a U.S. court of justice” if he didn’t get his hundred grand.

Pepper
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:47 am

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Pepper » 9 years 10 months ago (Tue Oct 06, 2009 3:18 pm)

mulenkamp

I'm positive that the eyewitness, documentary and physical evidence I can show would convince any historian or any court of justice in Germany or the US that the remains of a number of human beings immensely higher than Gerdes' idiotic "one tenth of one per cent" lie in the soil of both Sobibor and Treblinka and am also able to locate at least four of the Sobibor mass graves.



But obviously, he's not positive that he can convince Shermer / skeptic magazine to publish this alleged "proof."

If he's so positive, then why is he so afraid to submit it to skeptic magazine?

Does he really think he's convincing anyone?

I don't think he's even convincing himself.


mulenkamp

"In order to claim the reward, the applicant must submit evidence that would be considered by a US court of justice duly applying the pertinent rules of evidence as proving beyond a reasonable doubt the location and contents of at least one mass grave at Treblinka or Sobibor containing human remains that correspond to at least one tenth of one per cent of the amount of bones, bone fragments, teeth, ashes or other human remains that can be reasonably expected to lie in the soil of the respective former camp if a minimum of between 700,000 and 800,000 Jews were killed at Treblinka and between 150,000 and 250,000 Jews were killed at Sobibor."



As soon as skeptic magazine publishes your "proof" mulenkamp, you will have a "US court of justice" available to you if the NAFH doesn't proclaim you to be a winner of the reward.

Looks like muhenkamp is admitting that locating just one grave that contains just 1 percent of the alleged mass murder at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka is just too tough for him.

Hey mulankamp, let's see the proof that you've asked Shermer if he'll accept the above as "proof" of your claims.

If he won’t accept it, then your whole charade is a moot point, isn’t it?

But of course you know that, don’t you coward?

Remember, you can always call Shermer as a witness in a U.S. court of justice if you don't get what you think is coming to you via Gerdes / the NAFH.

It's the American way dontchaknow.

The "standards of evidence" start with Michael Shermer.

Let's see you take the first step coward.

Let's see you send your "proof" to skeptic magazine.

What are you so afraid of?

Pepper
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:47 am

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Pepper » 9 years 10 months ago (Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:24 am)

1 - So where exactly are all these alleged “huge mass graves” filled with millions of pounds of bone fragments, tens of millions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings?

RM’s A - In the present day Treblinka extermination camp memorial area, most probably under the areas numbered "2", "3" and "4" on the annotated present-day air photo.



Here is what the liar said on rodoh concerning areas 2 and 3


the question being about Jews currently buried there, the answer is no indeed,



And he confirms his lie with this


Tfs wrote:

Can you prove that the remains of so much as one single jew are currently buried within the boundaries of the western section of your annotation? YES or NO?


Bobo:
"The western section being the former "reception camp" and the question being about Jews currently buried there, the answer is no."



So he confirms his answer that anti-investigation barriers 2 and 3 cover the remains of no dead jews.

And he confirms that he has lied and changed his story yet again.

One day there not there, the next day they are.

They're not just magically disappearing jews, they're also magically reappearing jews.

What magical qualities the jews have.

And here is an interesting confession from mulehnkamp


As to the mass graves in the "death camp" sector, no, I cannot locate them



So, out of the 780,863 jews that mulankmap says are buried not just in Treblinka, but a very small part of Treblinka, he can't locate a single grave.

No wonder he keeps running away from Treblinka questions, only to lie like a rug whenever he's forced to stop running.

What a pathetic, shameless liar.
Last edited by Pepper on Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

Pepper
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:47 am

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Pepper » 9 years 10 months ago (Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:31 am)

Think about what was in that last post for a second.

mulahkamp admits he can't prove that the remains of so much as one single jew are currently buried in the western section of the camp, and he admits that he can't locate a single grave in the eastern part of the camp.

But then he says this

I'm positive that the eyewitness, documentary and physical evidence I can show would convince any historian or any court of justice in Germany or the US that the remains of a number of human beings immensely is higher than one tenth of one per cent in the soil of Treblinka



So why doensn't he take nafcash to a "US court of justice?"

Oh, that's right, he has to get his evidence published in skeptic magazine first.


Apparently, he's not positive that he can convince Shermer / skeptic magazine of what he's positive he can convince "any historian or any court of justice in Germany or the US."

But doesn't Shermer fancy himself a historian?

Why can't mulankmap convince Shermer then?

But wait, doesn’t Shermer believe that 900,000 jews are buried "in the soil of Treblinka?"

So what's stopping Shermer / mulenkmap from "showing the world" what's "in the soil of Treblinka?"

Pepper
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:47 am

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Pepper » 9 years 10 months ago (Tue Oct 13, 2009 1:25 pm)

Updated RM's "answers" to the 27 Treblinka questions.

1 - So where exactly are all these alleged "huge mass graves" filled with millions of pounds of bone fragments, tens of millions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings?

RM's A - In the present day Treblinka extermination camp memorial area, most probably under the areas numbered "2", "3" and "4" on the annotated present-day air photo.
Note the following contradiction that RM posted in his response on rodoh (He can’t keep track of his lies.)

Pepper: So he [RM] confirms his answer that anti-investigation barriers 2 and 3 cover the remains of no dead jews.
RM: No, he [RM is speaking of himself in the 3rd person] just confirms that he cannot prove that remains of murdered Jews are currently buried in these areas, because no remains were found in these areas during postwar investigations

So mullencamp not only admits that no human remains have ever been found under anti-investigation barriers 2 and 3, he also admits that he can’t locate / prove the existence of any human remains under anti-investigation barriers 2 and 3 . But in spite of this confession, he still says that anti-investigation barriers 2 and 3 cover "huge mass graves" filled with millions of pounds of bone fragments, tens of millions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings, despite the fact that both the Soviets and the Poles extensively excavated under anti-investigation barrier 3, and found, just as RM admitted – NOTHING – but trash. In other words, he’s just unwittingly contradicted himself and proved himself a liar.

And he further proves himself a liar here, as the western section of the camp covers anti-investigation barriers 2 and 3

Tfs: Can you prove that the remains of so much as one single jew are currently buried within the boundaries of
the western section of your annotation? YES or NO?

Bobo (RM): The western section being the former "reception camp" and the question being about Jews
currently buried there, the answer is no.

Did you catch that? The remains of - NOT A SINGLE JEW. In other words, he just unwittingly further contradicted himself and even further proved himself a liar. (Who just can’t keep his lies straight.)

2 - Do you believe that it's possible to murder 870,000 people and not leave behind a single trace of your crime?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question and instead responded to the question with a question.

3 - How hard would it be to locate / prove the existence of the alleged "huge mass graves" if they did in fact exist?

RM's A - Prove the existence of: as hard as it was to collect the pertinent evidence to mass murder and the mass graves necessarily related thereto… Locate: as hard as it will be to remove the memorial stones and the concrete plate on which they are set and to identify the outlines of the mass graves by means of excavation, core drilling or GPR technology.

Note he's suggesting that one would have to remove the anti-investigation barriers before one could do any excavations, core drilling or GPR, thus contradicting himself on the whole Krege GPR issue. He also totally ignores the fact that there are two large areas right in the middle of anti-investigation barrier #4 which would allow for excavations, core drilling and GPR. Also, look again at the Krege video. It is possible to do at least some excavations, core drilling and GPR amongst the stones in the monument. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past in which he claimed that the anti-investigation barriers only cover a portion of the alleged mass graves / remains. His story changes constantly.

4 -What percentage of the allegedly murdered jews are buried in sections A?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "we don't know" response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past about that area.

5 - B?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "we don't know" response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past about that area. He also also totally contradicts himself from his answer to question #1.

6 - C?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "we don't know" response.

He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past about that area. He has in the past claimed that virtually 100% of the alleged remains are currently buried in area C. (He's told so many lies and has changed his story so many times that he himself no longer knows what to think. He has gotten to the point that he just says whatever is convenient to say at any given moment, any and all past statement be dammed.)

7 -What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #1?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "don't know" response.

8 -What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #2?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "don't know" response. Notice how he contradicts his answer to question #1.

9 -What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #3?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "don't know" response. Notice how he contradicts his answer to question #1.

10 - What EXACTLY was found under the area that is now covered with anti-investigation barrier #4?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question.

11 - Where are all the photos showing EXACTLY what was found under the anti-investigation barriers?

RM's A – I have no photos showing "what was found” taken "just prior" to the erection of the memorial.
So why then did he show other photos? Just another case of RM’s fraud.
12 - The remains of how many jews are buried under anti-investigation barriers: #1?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "don't know" response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past about that area.

13 - #2?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "don't know" response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past about that area. Note also the contradiction to the "answer" he gave for question #1.

14 - #3?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question, but instead gave a "don't know" response. He also totally contradicts himself from the many statements he's made in the past about that area. Note also the contradiction to the "answer" he gave for question #1.

15 - #4?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question.

16 - The remains of how many jews are buried under all 4 anti-investigation barriers combined?

RM's A - Assuming that these 4 memorial areas coincide with all of Treblinka's mass grave areas (which is not necessarily the case)… At least 780,863.

Note how he's contradicting the answer he gave for question #3. Also note that of the alleged remains of the alleged "at least" 780,863 dead jews, he can't locate / prove the existence of so much as one. NOT ONE!
Updated RM’s A - What I cannot do yet is to physically locate the remains of any of the victims.
So now he’s admitting that he can’t locate / prove the existence of so much as one single jew at Treblinka.

17, 18, 19 & 20 - The remains of how many jews - in how many graves, are buried in each alleged mass graves area?

RM's A - don't know - why the fuck it should be known what amount of remains is presently buried in a given area?
So now, to go with his non answer response, he attempts to further evade the question by asking a question.

21 &22 - The remains of how many jews - in how many graves, are buried in both areas combined?

RM's A - don't know - why the fuck it should be known what amount of remains is presently buried in a given area?
So now, to go with his non answer response, he attempts to further evade the question by asking a question.

Note the large area that corresponds to Wiernik's claimed mass graves locations which could be investigated without having to "remove the memorial stones and the concrete plate on which they are set," thus totally contradicting his answer to question #3.

23 &24 - The remains of how many jews - in how many graves, are buried in Treblinka?

RM's A - RM refused to answer this question.

25 - Can you locate / prove the existence of just one grave that contains just one tenth of one percent of the alleged mass murder?

RM's A - His answer was mostly unintelligible gibberish. However, it was obviously not a yes, so that must mean it's a no. Of course, the fact that he's afraid to send any alleged proof of his being able to locate / prove the existence of just one grave that contains just one tenth of one percent of the alleged mass murder to skeptic magazine proves that he can't, so again, the answer must be no.

26 - Why does THE FINAL SOLUTION FORENSIC CHALLENGE reward remain unclaimed?

RM's A - One of the reasons is that Greg Gerdes doesn't dare to specify what his standards of evidence are, i.e. what he would accept as proof that so-and-so-many pounds of bone fragments or so-and-so-many teeth lie in a specific mass grave at Sobibor or Treblinka.

Gerdes –

Of course, all the above statements made by Muehlenkamp are blatant, shameless lies. However, the NAFH will address Muehlenkamp’s baseless accusations and make his wish come true.

Everything will be the same as is currently expressly stated on the http://www.nafcash.com/ website, with these exceptions:

He can use either Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka in his attempt at becoming an eligible claimant to The National Association of Forensic Historians - The Final Solution Forensic Challenge - reward offer of $100,000.00.

He must locate / prove the existence of just one grave that contains just ONE percent of the alleged mass murder.

He can choose Skeptic OR Archaeology magazines for his submittal for publication of his proof.

The amount of human remains that he will need to prove currently exists in his chosen grave at his chosen camp is expressly quantified as follows:

Belzec: 24,000 pounds of cremated bone fragments or 190,000 teeth.

Chelmno: 13,000 pounds of cremated bone fragments or 100,000 teeth.

Sobibor: 10,000 pounds of cremated bone fragments or 80,000 teeth.

Treblinka: 35,000 pounds of cremated bone fragments or 270,000 teeth.


Now that the NAFH has made Muehlenkamp’s wish come true, any further requests he has for changes, including lowering the - just one percent - requirement, in order to be considered, will have to be politely asked for by Muehlenkamp on his HC blog with the following headline:

Dear NAFH / Greg Gerdes, would you please make The Final Solution Forensic Challenge easier for me by…
The proof that the NAFH will accept as proof of what we require to be proven is that proof which has been

#1 – Published in “skeptic” magazine

AND that which

#2 – Stands up to skeptical inquiry

AND that which

#3 – Stands up to the scientific method

And thusly, that proof which

#4 – Has been proven to have proved the tangible physical evidence we require to have been proven

All claims of proof will have to be investigated and verified as legitimate, and you have been told this. And since it is impossible to say that something that we have never seen will stand up to skeptical inquiry and the scientific method, no determination can be made about what we can or cannot accept unless and until it’s been published. Of course, you know all this for a fact because it’s been told to you many times. You have also been told many times that we will consider anything and everything that is published in “skeptic” magazine. (Do you deny that you have been told the above information before? Go ahead and try to deny it - make my day.)

Publication is step one.

Remember, anytime after step one where you feel that you have been unjustly denied the reward money, you are free to take this issue to a “U.S. court of justice” and try your luck there. (That is why all supporters of The Final Solution Forensic Challenge are required to sign legally binding contracts and be legal residents of the U.S.) That’s the standard of evidence that you want applied to this issue, isn’t it? So why not take it there? You’re not afraid of taking things to that level, are you coward? You’re not afraid of “U.S. courts of justice,” are you? (Don’t you feel lucky, punk? We do.) We would love to see this go to that level. (And wouldn’t you just love to be the next Mel Mermelstein?)

So what’s wrong Muehlenkamp; don’t you think that you could find yourself a good jooish attorney for a case like this? Just think how many jooz would come out of the wood-work to help you with this, legally and financially. Or are you afraid that your “proof” won’t even get past that fraudulent rag “skeptic” magazine and its equally fraudulent owner Michael “flim-flam” Shermer? (That’s what you’re really afraid of here, isn’t it?)

This case could easily be taken to court if you can only get over the “skeptic” magazine hurdle. If having this case heard in court is what you want so badly, then get the ball rolling, coward. We dare you. (Your “proof” can get over the “skeptic” magazine hurdle, can’t it Muehlenkamp?) Didn’t you want to “show the world” what you were “proving” about the Reinhardt camps? (You’re showing the world alright, what a lying coward you are.)

What the lying coward Muehlenkamp is trying to hide behind is a mealy-mouthed claim that he doesn’t understand what kind of documentation the NAFH will accept as proof. He knows for a fact that The Final Solution Forensic Challenge requires the physical quantification of a graves dimensions and a minimum amount of its contents. And he knows for a fact the EXACT kind and EXACT amount of evidence that has to be physically quantified from the grave. So his latest ploy is to pretend that he has no idea how one would go about adequately documenting said physical quantification necessary to meet the NAFH’s standards of evidence.

Understanding what “standards of evidence” the NAFH will accept as proof is as easy to understand as being asked to physically quantify the number of coins you claim to have in your pocket. What if we asked for proof of just 10 femur bones from one grave? Would Muelenkamp be able to understand that challenge and be able to figure out what we would accept as proof? Only a mentally ill, emotionally disturbed pathological liar could pretend that they are unaware of how to go about properly documenting such a simple and explicitly explained challenge as The Final Solution Forensic Challenge.

Remember, we’re talking about locating and proving the tangible physical evidence that is claimed to exist in a precisely known area and the unimpeachable documentation of the quantification of that tangible physical evidence. (EXACTLY like what was allegedly done at Chelmno.) Do you know how to count Muelenkamp? Do know how to use a shovel? Do you know how to use a scale? Do you know how to use a camera? If you do, then you have all the requisite skills. And if you do, then go and physically locate and quantify that which is required to lay claim to the reward money all the while documenting it so thoroughly that your claim cannot be reasonably denied. (If you need to borrow the three tools necessary, just let us know and we will set you up.)

Pretending to not understand how to properly document the discovery of a mass grave and the quantification of its contents in this day and age of modern crime scene / forensic investigation techniques is one of the most laughable things I’ve ever heard. (But your performance is most entertaining Muehlnekamp; I almost hate writing this because it just might result in your putting an end to your charade, and I would really miss all the good yucks.)

Just imagine, Muehlenkamp has been dodging the challenge for all these months on the pretext that he doesn’t know how to count, or use a shovel, scale or camera. And all his other excuses about not being able to actually understand and / or meet the requirements of The Final Solution Forensic Challenge prove to be fraudulent the second you research his past statements and look at the claims being made about Chelmno. (See: Nick does Chelmno - on the rodoh forum for example.)

One thing to keep in mind Muehlenkamp, the evidence that is published in “skeptic” magazine will be judged not only on what it includes, but also on what it excludes. My advice to you is, strive for complete and irrefutable documentation and total transparency. If you “do it right,” there will be nothing for you to worry about; so do it right. Over engineer your submittal. Document your findings so thoroughly that the NAFH would be foolish to deny your claim to the reward money. Document your discovery as if you wanted to “prove to the world” once and for all that there really were holocausts within the holocaust at the Reinhardt camps. Document it so utterly well that it simply cannot be denied, using any and every modern forensic science / crime scene investigation tool / technique that you can possibly think of. Strive to cover every base, cross every T and dot every I. Avoid any and all situations that would call into question the legitimacy of your submittal / investigation. (I.e. – don’t pull another Shermer.) Avoid like the plague any and all situations that could even hint at fraud. Document it better than the Germans documented the Katyn holocaust. Be as transparent with your investigation as the Germans were while investigating the Katyn holocaust. Invite more people from around the world to witness your investigation that the Germans did while investigating the Katyn holocaust.

Document it as if there is a billion dollars on the line rather than just $100,000.00.


The ONLY reason RM is lying so much about and crying for further changes in The Final Solution Forensic Challenge is because he simply cannot prove the existence of so much as one grave that contains so much as 1/10 of 1% of the alleged mass murder at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor or Treblinka. He knows he can't pass even the fraudulent skeptics society's standards of proof, thus we get the above lame excuses. What a coward.

27 - Why do the jews shamelessly label those who have the intelligence to see through their absurd fraud as "haters" and endeavor to persecute anyone who refuses to believe their physically impossible Treblinka holocaust fable?

RM's A - RM refused to answer the question.

RM's "answers" and non answers to the above 27 questions demonstrate conclusive evidence that would be considered by a US court of justice duly applying the pertinent rules of evidence as proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a certifiably insane and emotional disturbed pathological liar and congenital coward.

And here is an interesting confession from mullahnaps recent rodoh posts that is very telling in the least

RM - The "physical quantification" standard is as unreasonable as can be and means I'll have to wait for completion of the SAP's work before submitting any evidence to SKEPTIC magazine

It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to understand that the above statement is proof positive that mulenkhamp understands completely what nafcash’s standards of evidence are, further proving what a lying coward he is.

Imagine, someone saying that the physical quantification of just 1/10 of 1% of tangible physical evidence is “unreasonable.” Apparently, mulememkmap is so stupid, he doesn’t know how to count or use a scale.

Maybe if muhanklamp asks nafcash real nice, nafcash will lower the standard even further?

Greg Gerdes
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:03 pm

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Greg Gerdes » 9 years 7 months ago (Tue Dec 29, 2009 12:23 pm)

I would like to invite Warheit and our resident "qualified criminologist" AHolland to walk us all through these questions.

Let's start with the first one on the list:


According to The Encyclopedia of the Holocaust (and many other sources), at Treblinka – 870,000 jews were allegedly murdered, buried, then dug up and cremated, then all of the alleged remains dumped right back into the original “huge mass graves” and covered over with a layer of soil; thus “obliterating” all the evidence. This of course begs the question: So where exactly are all these alleged “huge mass graves” filled with millions of pounds of bone fragments, tens of millions of teeth and tens of thousands of bullets and shell casings?



You're not afaid of a few simple questions, are you boys?

And what an opportunity it is for all of us here at CODOH to have a "qualified criminologist" give us his "expert" opinions.

I can hardly wait to see what new insights these two experts on Treblinka are going to share with us.

Greg Gerdes
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 411
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:03 pm

Re: The Famous THIRTY TREBLINKA QUESTIONS

Postby Greg Gerdes » 9 years 7 months ago (Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:27 pm)

Looks like Warhiet and his pal AHollandkamp can't answer one simple question.

Let's try again.

Warheit / AHollankamp, was question #1 too hard for you?

Yes or No?


If it is, just let me know. I'll try to make it easier for you.


Is the question

A - too hard?

or

B - are you just afraid to answer it?


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests