Let's talk Belzec

[Pizzaman]

Here's a wide open question for anyone to field. We know there are several survivors of Treblinka and fewer, though a few, from Sobibor. We also know that there are dozens of survivors of Auschwitz and Majdanek, but the standard history does not claim that these two camps were purely extermination camps.

That leaves Chelmno and Belzec out of the main six, so let's talk Belzec. Two people are said to have survived. However, as Belzec is one of the AR camps, it's said that Belzec was also a transit camp.

OK then: Transited where?

[The Warden]

Here's a wide open question for anyone to field. We know there are several survivors of Treblinka and fewer, though a few, from Sobibor. We also know that there are dozens of survivors of Auschwitz and Majdanek, but the standard history does not claim that these two camps were purely extermination camps.

That leaves Chelmno and Belzec out of the main six, so let's talk Belzec. Two people are said to have survived. However, as Belzec is one of the AR camps, it's said that Belzec was also a transit camp.

OK then: Transited where?

This is getting monotonous. Pizzaman wants to change the name of the camp to continue perpetrating the same canard over and over again. If you believe the camp was an "extermination camp", then show the remains of the people who were exterminated.

You don't prove something is red by proving it's not blue.

Where did they go? Don't know, but one thing is for sure: They aren't in Belzec where they were allegedly exterminated.
Unless you can show us some physical evidence for the amounts claimed?

[SSeth]

Hey Warden, look at what muehlenkamp just admitted about Belzec over at The Revisionist Workshop:

Greg Gerdes wrote:

roberto, in order to get answers, you must give answers.

When I get the answers that I seek from you to the 28 questions that I have asked you, I will answer 28 of the questions on this list...

And here are the 28 questions:

These are the sites / groups / operations in which it is still being fraudulently alleged by exterminationists that the Germans used poison gas to murder people during WW II:

http://rodohforum.yuku.com/sreply/23797 ... s-chambers


roberto, can you CURRENTLY provide the name of just one jew - with proof - who died by means of poison gas in a so-called “homicidal gas chamber” operated by the Germans during WW II at / by one of these sites / groups / operations:


1 - Auschwitz / Birkenau - Yes or No?

2 - BdS Belgrad / Semlin - Yes or No?

3 - Belzec - Yes or No?

4 - Bernburg - Yes or No?

5 - Brandenburg - Yes or No?

6 - Chelmno - Yes or No?

7 - Dachau - Yes or No?

8 - Einsatzgruppe A - Yes or No?

9 - Einsatzgruppe B - Yes or No?

10 - Einsatzgruppe C - Yes or No?

11 - Einsatzgruppe D - Yes or No?

12 - Fort VII, Poznan - Yes or No?

13 - Grafeneck - Yes or No?

14 - Gusen - Yes or No?

15 - Hadamar - Yes or No?

16 - Hartheim - Yes or No?

17 - Majdanek - Yes or No?

18 - Maly Trostinec - Yes or No?

19 - Mauthausen - Yes or No?

20 - Mogilev - Yes or No?

21 - Natzweiler - Yes or No?

22 - Neuengamme - Yes or No?

23 - Ravensbrück - Yes or No?

24 - Sachsenhausen - Yes or No?

25 - Sobibor - Yes or No?

26 - Sonnenstein - Yes or No?

27 - Stutthof - Yes or No?

28 - Treblinka - Yes or No?


Please note that what I ask are simple yes or no questions. Either roberto can or he can't. If he can, then the answer is yes. If he can't, then the answer is no.

Yes or No - simple as that.

If roberto gives so much as one single word more than - yes or no - then he will not get answers to 28 of his questions.

Roberto’s verbatim and in Toto reply / post:

These are my 28 yes or no answers to the following question:

roberto, can you CURRENTLY provide the name of just one jew - with proof - who died by means of poison gas in a so-called “homicidal gas chamber” operated by the Germans during WW II at / by one of these sites / groups / operations:


Answers:

1 - Auschwitz / Birkenau - No

2 - BdS Belgrad / Semlin - No

3 - Belzec - No

4 - Bernburg - Yes

5 - Brandenburg - Yes

6 - Chelmno - No

7 - Dachau - No

8 - Einsatzgruppe A - No

9 - Einsatzgruppe B - No

10 - Einsatzgruppe C - No

11 - Einsatzgruppe D - No

12 - Fort VII, Poznan - No

13 - Grafeneck - Yes

14 - Gusen - No

15 - Hadamar - Yes

16 - Hartheim - Yes

17 - Majdanek - No

18 - Maly Trostinec - No

19 - Mauthausen - No

20 - Mogilev - No

21 - Natzweiler - No

22 – Neuengamme No

23 - Ravensbrück - No

24 - Sachsenhausen - No

25 - Sobibor - Yes

26 - Sonnenstein - Yes

27 - Stutthof - No

28 - Treblinka – Yes

[SSeth]

Hey Warden, look at how muehlenkamp is cracking big-time on the subject of Belzec:

Let's cut through all of rm's bs and recap what he just admitted / claimed:


roberto, are you saying that the TOTAL number of human remains, i.e. - the COMBINED - number of corpses and remains of bodies CURRENTLY interred in Belzec “grave” # 1/1 is no less than -

30,585?

Yes or No?

roberto admits that his answer is – NO.

roberto, can you prove that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 currently contains the corpses AND the remains of bodies that COMBINED, totals the remains of no less than - 30,585 people?

Yes or No?

roberto admits that his answer is – NO.

roberto, can you prove that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 currently contains the corpses AND the remains of bodies that COMBINED, totals the remains of - at least 19 bodies?

Yes or No?

roberto claims that he can and has proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains the corpses AND the remains of bodies that COMBINED, totals the remains of - at least 19 bodies.


* roberto, please provide the name of the most prominent skeptic who [/quote]has endorsed your claim that you have proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains the corpses AND the remains of bodies that COMBINED, totals the remains of - at least 19 bodies.

roberto, can you prove that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single "corpse?"

Yes or No?

roberto claims that he can and has proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single "corpse."


* roberto, please provide the name of the most prominent skeptic who has endorsed your claim that you have proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single "corpse."

roberto, can you prove that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single pound of bone fragments?

Yes or No?

roberto claims that he can and has proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single pound of bone fragments.


* roberto, please provide the name of the most prominent skeptic who has endorsed your claim that you have proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single pound of bone fragments.

roberto, can you prove that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains so-much-as one single tooth?

Yes or No?

roberto admits that his answer is – NO.


* * * * *


Clarifying questions:


roberto, you claim that you can and have proven that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains at least:


# 1 - One single pound of bone fragments.

# 2 - One single "corpse."

# 3 - The corpses AND the remains of bodies that COMBINED, totals the remains of - at least 19 bodies.


However, you also admit that you cannot prove that Belzec “grave” # 1/1 CURRENTLY contains the corpses AND the remains of bodies that COMBINED, totals the remains of no less than - 30,585 people, or that said grave contains so much as one single tooth.


So roberto:

# 1 - What is the MAXIMUM number of pounds of bone fragments that you can prove CURRENTLY exists in Belzec “grave” # 1/1?

# 2 - What is the MAXIMUM number of "corpses" that you can prove CURRENTLY exists in Belzec “grave” # 1/1?

# 3 - What is the MAXIMUN number of corpses AND the remains of bodies COMBINED that you can prove CURRENTLY exists in Belzec “grave” # 1/1?[/quote]



http://revisionistworkshop.com/forum/vi ... ?f=9&t=540