Rudolf debunks the Krakow Report & Zyklon-B 'holes'

Read and post various viewpoints or search our large archives.

Moderator: Moderator

Forum rules
Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9871
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Rudolf debunks the Krakow Report & Zyklon-B 'holes'

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 5 years ago (Wed Dec 03, 2003 1:32 am)

For the new reader, the 2nd Krakow Report was an embarrassing attempt by the 'holocaust' Industry to buttress the thoroughly debunked 'gas chambers' claims at Auschwitz.

The 'holes' were the alleged openings on top of the alleged 'gas chambers' of Auschwitz-Birkenau where the cyanide carrying Zyklon-B was supposedly dumped into wire mesh baskets in such a manner that the Jews inside would be gassed. See that fraud shown the door here as well.

Too lengthy to post here, but this is a must read for anyone who favors science and logic over propaganda and superstition.

http://www.vho.org/GB/c/GR/RudolfOnVanPelt.html#

also see The Rudolf Report for even more:

http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/index.html

additional Revisionist Forum threads:
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=392
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=192
http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=404

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9871
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 5 years ago (Wed May 12, 2004 9:57 am)

More which demolishes Harry Mazal's bizarre 'Holes Report'.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 3 years ago (Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:15 am)

Hannover wrote:More which demolishes Harry Mazal's bizarre 'Holes Report'.
Yes, were is it...

Could you summarize the arguments against the Cracow Report?!

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9871
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 3 years ago (Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:41 am)


Could you summarize the arguments against the Cracow Report?!

See the links I gave.

- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
ClaudiaRothenbach
Valued contributor
Valued contributor
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:16 pm

Postby ClaudiaRothenbach » 1 decade 3 years ago (Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:49 pm)

Hektor wrote:Could you summarize the arguments against the Cracow Report?!


For lazy bones:

They used a method that only detects instable CN compounds - although they researched a topic that allegedly took place 60 years ago.

They found CN concentration below the detection limit for the extraction and detection method - but they attempted to have found significant amounts.

Simply a fraud.
"Everything has already been said, but not yet by everyone." - Karl Valentin

User avatar
Hannover
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 9871
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 7:53 pm

Postby Hannover » 1 decade 3 years ago (Wed Oct 04, 2006 3:55 pm)

here Lazybones, from The Rudolf Report:

8.3.2. Institute for Forensic Research, Cracow
http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/8.html#8.3.2.
and:
False Method of Analysis
http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/8.html#8.4.2.
8.4.2. False Method of Analysis

Many people, both experts and laymen, rely good-naturedly upon the findings of the Jan Sehn Institute for Forensic Research in Cracow, i.e., the study published in 1994 by Prof. Markiewicz and colleagues. These Polish scientists, however, tested their samples with analytical methods that were unable to detect stable iron cyanide compounds. They did this because they could not imagine how such stable iron cyanide compounds could form. It is, of course, no shame to fail to understand something initially. Anyone, however, who makes a claim to scientific reliability must, before making statements upon the subject, at least attempt to investigate and understand. But not so the Polish scientists. They assert their lack of understanding as a justification for their failure to act. Has anyone ever heard that failure to understand a phenomenon was any reason for scientists not to study it? To the Polish scientists, this was obviously the case. It would only be permissible to exclude Iron Blue from the study if it were possible to exclude, with practical certainty, that the effects of hydrogen cyanide on masonry could result in the formation of iron cyanide, and, consequently, Iron Blue, and if there were at least some indication that these rooms had been painted with Iron Blue. The Polish scientists completely neglected to do this. And even worse: they did not even attempt to refute my arguments on the formation of stable iron cyanide compounds which I published in early 1993.[512] They were familiar with this publication, because they quoted it, but not, for example, in order to discuss my arguments, but simply to condemn it flatly as an example of the allegedly diabolical deeds of the 'deniers' and the 'whitewashers' of Hitler, who Prof. Markiewicz and his colleagues intended to refute-so their own words. This should suffice to show that the Polish actions were ideologically motivated, to a high degree. If they had been neutral scientists, they would have applied the correct and interpretable method of analysis and would have discussed my publications in a scholarly manner instead of worrying about Hitler's dirty laundry.

Prof. Markiewicz and his colleagues did not even attempt to find any explanation for the high iron cyanide concentration in the walls of the disinfestation chambers and their blotchy-blue surfaces.

Although they had sought out an analytical method able to produce the results desired by them, the results of their first series of tests were obviously so disturbing that they decided to suppress them and never published them. These data only became public knowledge through an act of indiscretion in 1991 (see chapter 8.3.2.).[513]

The Polish scientists therefore rejected the undesired results of their first series of tests and took even more samples, until they finally produced the results that fitted in with their preconception: this time, both the samples from the disinfestation chamber and the alleged 'gas chambers' showed cyanide residues on the same order of magnitude.[57]

But even Prof. Markiewicz and his colleagues, during the test fumigations performed by them, at least confirmed that moist cement mortar (as was used in the morgues of crematoria II and III) absorbs at least ten times more hydrogen cyanide than dry lime mortar (as used in the disinfestation chambers), as I had assumed for my calculations in this work.


- Hannover
If it can't happen as alleged, then it didn't.

User avatar
Hektor
Valuable asset
Valuable asset
Posts: 3345
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:59 am

Postby Hektor » 1 decade 6 months ago (Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:06 am)

Hannover wrote:For the new reader, the 2nd Krakow Report was an embarrassing attempt by the 'holocaust' Industry to buttress the thoroughly debunked 'gas chambers' claims at Auschwitz.
You say second Krakow Report. Does that mean there is more then one?


Return to “'Holocaust' Debate / Controversies / Comments / News”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 4 guests