Be sure to read the Rules/guidelines before you post!
I must mention that attempts to tar & feather Revisionists with the 'evil Nazi' canard will not be tolerated here. Your first post here was deleted accordingly.
I invite you to post on specifics of the story which I assume you accept as fact. We will then debate those specifics in a reasonable manner as noted in our posting guidelines.
Again, start separate threads on those links you gave and please comment on the reasons you find those links credible.
David, we want to discuss specifics with you; but in a way that is clear, and on topic to the initial post in any given thread.
that previous note to you:
Some points about your deleted post:
You posted 3 links without comment as to why you found them credible, AND they were separate threads unto themselves.
Just posting various links without serious comment on the issue at hand (Bruns and his alleged taped conversation) will not suffice.
Flooding the thread with only vaguely related links which are not commented upon is not debate.
However, if you find those links supportive of any position you accept, then please start separate threads on each of them; and once again, tell us why you find them credible. We're more than glad to debate you.
I would also invite you to peruse the rest of the Forum.
Thanks for your cooperation,
Your continual posting of accusatory, off topic material is getting you nowhere. It has the effect of making you appear as if you are actually dodging debate and simply trashing the Forum without ever supporting your positions. Unfortunately, that is an all too common tactic for those who lack evidence in which to rebut Revisionist research.
We welcome your views and the reasons you have them, those must be stated specifically in order for debate proceed.
Your post of 7 topics for debate in 1 thread must be done in separate threads, hence I deleted it.
It is much too unwieldy to tackle 7 topics in 1 thread, you know that. The guidelines are clear in that regard, why do you persist?
Let's take them 1 at a time or not at all.
Please review the guidelines which you agreed to.
You just posted your 'question #1' (please make you subject line more clear), and it's essentially the same as the very recent (Apr. 5) 'Operation Reinhard Camps' thread:
Post another reply to that thread if you feel you have something to say about the same subject. I'm not going to allow the Forum to be swamped with redundant threads in such a short time.
You are continually challenged on your posts; and that's the way it should be, we debate here. However, you do not respond to the challenges, yet you continue to post to those threads as if not challenged.
Please respond to the challenges with specifics.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests